OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the indications for urodynamics studies (UDS) previous to renal transplantation (RT) and the results of bladder cycling (BC), performed in selected cases. METHODS: Among 475 RT, 33 patients (6.9%) required UDS according our protocol. Indications were: (1) low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS); (2) defunctionalized bladder (DB), and (3) complex urologic history (reflux, neurogenic bladder, urethral valves, etc.). DB was defined as a total urinary output of <300 ml/24 h. Patients with DB underwent BC through a suprapubic catheter, undergoing UDS after BC. The rate and type of urodynamic anomalies were compared among the 3 groups. Cystometric capacity (CysCap) and compliance were evaluated according to the etiology of renal failure, diuresis, and number of previous bladder surgeries. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (45%) showed abnormal UDS, Increased pressure at cystometry was the most frequent finding (46%). The rate of abnormal UDS among the 3 groups was not statistically significant (66.6% in DB, 42.8% in LUTS, and 35% in those with complex urologic history). Compliance and CysCap were significantly lower in the patients with DB, showing a significant correlation with diuresis. These parameters did not correlate with the number of previous bladder surgeries. BC resulted in normal UDS in 3 patients (33%) and a change in diagnosis in 2 patients (22%). CONCLUSION: Our indications gave a good diagnostic yield. Patients with DB represent a group with different urodynamic findings. BC provides a more precise diagnosis or normalization of UDS in some cases.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the indications for urodynamics studies (UDS) previous to renal transplantation (RT) and the results of bladder cycling (BC), performed in selected cases. METHODS: Among 475 RT, 33 patients (6.9%) required UDS according our protocol. Indications were: (1) low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS); (2) defunctionalized bladder (DB), and (3) complex urologic history (reflux, neurogenic bladder, urethral valves, etc.). DB was defined as a total urinary output of <300 ml/24 h. Patients with DB underwent BC through a suprapubic catheter, undergoing UDS after BC. The rate and type of urodynamic anomalies were compared among the 3 groups. Cystometric capacity (CysCap) and compliance were evaluated according to the etiology of renal failure, diuresis, and number of previous bladder surgeries. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (45%) showed abnormal UDS, Increased pressure at cystometry was the most frequent finding (46%). The rate of abnormal UDS among the 3 groups was not statistically significant (66.6% in DB, 42.8% in LUTS, and 35% in those with complex urologic history). Compliance and CysCap were significantly lower in the patients with DB, showing a significant correlation with diuresis. These parameters did not correlate with the number of previous bladder surgeries. BC resulted in normal UDS in 3 patients (33%) and a change in diagnosis in 2 patients (22%). CONCLUSION: Our indications gave a good diagnostic yield. Patients with DB represent a group with different urodynamic findings. BC provides a more precise diagnosis or normalization of UDS in some cases.