Literature DB >> 11025242

Emergence characteristics of sevoflurane compared to halothane in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral pressure equalization tube insertion.

J P Cravero1, M Beach, C P Dodge, K Whalen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the emergence characteristics of sevoflurane with halothane in pediatric patients having bilateral myringotomy and pressure equalization tube insertion using a highly standardized and common anesthetic technique.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 43 ASA physical status I and II healthy pediatric outpatients scheduled for initial ear tube placement by one surgeon.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either halothane or sevoflurane as their sole anesthetic drug for ear tube insertion. All patients as well as the research nurse grading emergence agitation were blinded to group assignment. No premedication was administered, and all patients received a standard dose of rectal acetaminophen for postoperative pain control. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
RESULTS: The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with emergence agitation, defined as thrashing behavior requiring physical restraint for greater than three minutes. Time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and from the hospital were also compared. Sevoflurane patients had a greater incidence of emergence delirium: 57% versus 27% [95% CI (1.7%-58.1%) p = 0.047]. Time to discharge from the PACU and the hospital were longer for patients who received sevoflurane: 62 versus 50 min [95% CI (1.4-23.6) p = 0.02] and 102 versus 79 mins [95% CI (9.6-37.1) p = 0.003].
CONCLUSION: In our institution there is a trend toward greater emergence agitation in ear tube placement patients given sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia. Further, (with our discharge criteria) patients are actually discharged from the PACU and the hospital faster when given halothane as a sole anesthetic when compared to sevoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11025242     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00180-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of sevoflurane delirium and agitation with propofol.

Authors:  Zakaria Messieha
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

2.  Two-agent analgesia versus acetaminophen in children having bilateral myringotomies and tubes surgery.

Authors:  Sally Rampersad; Nathalia Jimenez; Heidi Bradford; Kristy Seidel; Anne Lynn
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Hypnotic depth and the incidence of emergence agitation and negative postoperative behavioral changes.

Authors:  Debra J Faulk; Mark D Twite; Jeannie Zuk; Zhaoxing Pan; Brett Wallen; Robert H Friesen
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  Emergence and Recovery Characteristics of Five Common Anesthetics in Pediatric Anesthesia: a Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianrong Guo; Xiaoju Jin; Huan Wang; Jun Yu; Xiaofang Zhou; Yong Cheng; Qiang Tao; Li Liu; Jianping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  The effects of midazolam and sevoflurane on the GABA(A) receptors with alternatively spliced variants of the γ2 subunit.

Authors:  Woosik Eom; Jung Min Lee; Jeongmi Park; Kyungho Choi; Sung-Jun Jung; Hee-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-02-25

6.  Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Haiyun Wang; Ai Zhu; Kaijun Niu; Guolin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Three minutes propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia to prevent emergence agitation following inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mostafa Samy Abbas; Essam Ezzat Abd El-Hakeem; Hossam Esmat Kamel
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery.

Authors:  Lawrence R Lustig; Amy Ingram; D Macy Vidrine; Andrew R Gould; Jacob W Zeiders; Randall A Ow; Christopher R Thompson; Jonathan R Moss; Ritvik Mehta; John E McClay; Amy Brenski; John Gavin; Erik H Waldman; John Ansley; David M Yen; Neil K Chadha; Michael T Murray; Frederick K Kozak; Christopher York; David M Brown; Eli Grunstein; Robert C Sprecher; Denise A Sherman; Scott R Schoem; Robert Puchalski; Susannah Hills; Audrey Calzada; Dan Harfe; Laura J England; Charles A Syms
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems.

Authors:  David M Yen; Michael T Murray; Robert Puchalski; Andrew R Gould; John Ansley; Randall A Ow; Jonathan R Moss; Laura J England; Charles A Syms
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2020-02-24

10.  Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Lidocaine and Epinephrine Following Iontophoresis of the Tympanic Membrane in a Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Laura J England; Charles A Syms; Christopher York
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.