Literature DB >> 11025176

Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients.

W H Sheng1, W J Ko, J T Wang, S C Chang, P R Hsueh, K T Luh.   

Abstract

Central venous catheterization represents a significant medical advancement, particularly in the treatment of critical ill. However, there is a high risk of central venous catheters-related infection. A novel antiseptic central venous catheter, made of polyurethane and impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine, was developed to reduce the risk of catheters-related infection. In this study, we did a randomized clinical study to determine the efficacy by using antiseptic catheters for the prevention of central venous catheters-related infection in the intensive care units. A total of 204 patients with 235 central venous catheters were studied at the surgical intensive care units at National Taiwan University Hospital between November 1998 and June 1999. Participants received either a standard triple-lumen polyurethane catheter or an antiseptic catheter (Arrow International, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA). Both were indistinguishable from each other. Compared to standard polyurethane catheters, antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized by microorganisms when they were cultured at the removal (8.0 versus 20.0 colonized catheters per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.74]; p<0.01). There was no significant differences between both groups in catheter-related infections (0.9 versus 4.9 infections per 100 catheters; relative risk 0.17 [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.15]; p = 0.07). Gram-positive cocci and fungi were more likely to colonize in the standard polyurethane catheters (p = 0.06 and 0.04, compared to antiseptic catheters respectively). Two of our cases in the control group died directly due to catheter-related candidemia. No adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity or leukopenia were found in the antiseptic catheter group. Our study showed that central venous catheters with antiseptic coating were safe and had less risk of colonization of bacteria and fungi than standard catheters in the critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11025176     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00166-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  18 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately?

Authors:  W Michael Dunne
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Diagnosis, prevention, and management of catheter related bloodstream infection during long term parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  D Hodge; J W L Puntis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  The relationship between methodological trial quality and the effects of impregnated central venous catheters.

Authors:  Christine Geffers; Irina Zuschneid; Tim Eckmanns; Henning Rüden; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christof von Eiff; Bernd Jansen; Wolfgang Kohnen; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Anti-infective-treated central venous catheters: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  B S Niël-Weise; T Stijnen; P J van den Broek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Antimicrobial impregnated catheters in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Sarah K Wassil; Catherine M Crill; Stephanie J Phelps
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-04

7.  Clonal Spread of Candida glabrata Bloodstream Isolates and Fluconazole Resistance Affected by Prolonged Exposure: a 12-Year Single-Center Study in Belgium.

Authors:  Berdieke Goemaere; Katrien Lagrou; Isabel Spriet; Marijke Hendrickx; Pierre Becker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters: their evaluation in burn patients.

Authors:  G Ramos; A Bolgiani; O Patiño; G Prezzavento; P Guastavino; R Durlach; L Fernandez Caniggia; F Benaim
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2006-06-30

9.  Evaluation of a triple-lumen central venous heparin-coated catheter versus a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine in critically ill patients.

Authors:  M N Carrasco; A Bueno; C de las Cuevas; S Jimenez; I Salinas; A Sartorius; T Recio; M Generelo; F Ruiz-Ocaña
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Catheter impregnation, coating or bonding for reducing central venous catheter-related infections in adults.

Authors:  Nai Ming Lai; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Nai An Lai; Elizabeth O'Riordan; Wilson Shu Cheng Pau; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.