Literature DB >> 11024379

[(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and its prognostic value in lung cancer.

K Dhital1, C A Saunders, P T Seed, M J O'Doherty, J Dussek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography (PET) is being increasingly used as an accurate and non-invasive modality in diagnosis, staging and post-therapy assessment in patients with lung cancer. In this study, we examine whether the uptake of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a marker of increased glucose metabolism in neoplastic cells, is of prognostic value in patients with primary lung cancer.
METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (mean age, 63. 0 years; male/female ratio, 53:24) with primary lung cancers who underwent whole body and localized thoracic PET as part of their diagnostic and staging procedures prior to consideration of surgical resection. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of injected FDG for each primary lesion was correlated with tumour histology and the patient's clinical outcome.
RESULTS: A SUV of 20 or greater was found to be of significant prognostic value. The chance of survival (with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) at 12 months post-surgery for the various SUV groups was as follows: 75.2% (59.6-85.5) for SUV<10; 67.5% (29.0-88.2) for SUV 10-<12; 63.6% (29.7-84.5) for SUV 12-<15; 66.7% (19.5-90.4) for SUV 15-<20; 16.7% (0.01-0.52) for SUV>20. A SUV of 20 or more is associated with a 4.66 times increase in hazard, compared with lower levels of SUV. We found no significant correlation between tumour histology and SUV.
CONCLUSION: We have previously reported on the significant advantages of PET in the staging and surgical care of patients with lung cancer. The present study adds further support for an additional prognostic role for PET in the management of thoracic malignancy as determined by the amount of labelled-FDG taken up by the primary lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11024379     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00535-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  23 in total

1.  Is quantitation necessary for oncological PET studies? Against.

Authors:  Michael M Graham
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Requirements for clinical PET: comparisons within Europe.

Authors:  Michael Bedford; Michael N Maisey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Stable isotope-resolved metabolomics and applications for drug development.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Katherine Sellers; Hunter N B Moseley; Richard M Higashi; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Comparison of prognostic values of primary tumor and nodal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in non-small cell lung cancer with N1 disease.

Authors:  Chae Hong Lim; Seung Hyup Hyun; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Risk assessment in liposarcoma patients based on FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Winfried Brenner; Janet F Eary; Willy Hwang; Cheryl Vernon; Ernest U Conrad
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Survival Prognostic Value of Morphological and Metabolic variables in Patients with Stage I and II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  L Domachevsky; D Groshar; R Galili; M Saute; H Bernstine
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Risk stratification of solitary pulmonary nodules by means of PET using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose and SUV quantification.

Authors:  Aleksandar Grgic; Yildirim Yüksel; Andreas Gröschel; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Gerhard W Sybrecht; Carl-Martin Kirsch; Dirk Hellwig
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Prospects for clinical cancer metabolomics using stable isotope tracers.

Authors:  Andrew N Lane; Teresa W-M Fan; Richard M Higashi; Jinlian Tan; Michael Bousamra; Donald M Miller
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.362

10.  Dual-phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Andrej Lyshchik; Tatsuya Higashi; Yuji Nakamoto; Koji Fujimoto; Ryuichiro Doi; Masayuki Imamura; Tsuneo Saga
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.