Literature DB >> 11023847

Sub-ice foraging behavior of emperor penguins.

P J Ponganis1, R P Van Dam, G Marshall, T Knower, D H Levenson.   

Abstract

Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) were equipped with a remote underwater video camera, the Crittercam, to evaluate sub-ice foraging behavior while the birds dived from an isolated dive hole. Three birds dived and foraged successfully for 1 h periods after being trained to wear and to dive with a harness for camera attachment. Video and depth profile recordings revealed that emperor penguins travel at shallow depths (<50 m), ascend to the undersurface of the ice to feed on fish, and descend back to depth to return to the exit hole. Although the mean durations of dives of individual birds with the Crittercam were 21-35 % shorter than the diving durations of these same birds without the camera, the dive profiles in both situations were similar, thus demonstrating a similar foraging strategy in birds diving without the camera. Despite shorter diving durations with the camera, the penguins were still successful at prey capture in 80 % of 91 dives greater than 1 min in duration. Prey included the sub-ice fish Pagothenia borchgrevinki. Hunting ascents (from depth to within 5 m of the surface) occurred in 85 % of dives, ranged from zero to three per dive, and were associated with successful prey capture in 77 % of 128 ascents. Occasionally, several fish were captured during a single ascent. These observations and this application of video technology create a model for further physiological and behavioral studies of foraging, and also emphasize the potential importance of shallow dives as sources of food intake for emperor penguins during foraging trips to sea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023847     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.21.3275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  17 in total

1.  Penguin-mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour.

Authors:  A Takahashi; K Sato; Y Naito; M J Dunn; P N Trathan; J P Croxall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  A review of the multi-level adaptations for maximizing aerobic dive duration in marine mammals: from biochemistry to behavior.

Authors:  Randall W Davis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  What triggers the aerobic dive limit? Patterns of muscle oxygen depletion during dives of emperor penguins.

Authors:  Cassondra L Williams; Jessica U Meir; Paul J Ponganis
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability.

Authors:  Yuuki Y Watanabe; Akinori Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Feeding kinematics, suction, and hydraulic jetting performance of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).

Authors:  Christopher D Marshall; Sven Wieskotten; Wolf Hanke; Frederike D Hanke; Alyssa Marsh; Brian Kot; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  O2 store management in diving emperor penguins.

Authors:  P J Ponganis; T K Stockard; J U Meir; C L Williams; K V Ponganis; R Howard
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Modelling foraging movements of diving predators: a theoretical study exploring the effect of heterogeneous landscapes on foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Kamil A Bartoń; Beth E Scott; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) use vision to forage on gelatinous prey in mid-water.

Authors:  Tomoko Narazaki; Katsufumi Sato; Kyler J Abernathy; Greg J Marshall; Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selfies of Imperial Cormorants (Phalacrocorax atriceps): What Is Happening Underwater?

Authors:  Agustina Gómez-Laich; Ken Yoda; Carlos Zavalaga; Flavio Quintana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modelling the effects of prey size and distribution on prey capture rates of two sympatric marine predators.

Authors:  Chris B Thaxter; Francis Daunt; David Grémillet; Mike P Harris; Silvano Benvenuti; Yutaka Watanuki; Keith C Hamer; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.