Literature DB >> 11023601

Comparative risk assessment of secondary cancer incidence after treatment of Hodgkin's disease with photon and proton radiation.

U Schneider1, A Lomax, N Lombriser.   

Abstract

Probabilities for secondary cancer incidence have been estimated for a patient with Hodgkin's disease for whom treatment has been planned with different radiation modalities using photons and protons. The ICRP calculation scheme has been used to calculate cancer incidence from dose distributions. For this purpose, target volumes as well as critical structures have been outlined in the CT set of a patient with Hodgkin's disease. Dose distributions have been calculated using conventional as well as intensity-modulated treatment techniques using photon and proton radiation. The cancer incidence has been derived from the mean doses for each organ. The results of this work are: (a) Intensity-modulated treatment of Hodgkin's disease using nine photon fields (15 MV) results in nearly the same cancer incidence as treating with two opposed photon fields (6 MV). (b) Intensity-modulated treatment using nine proton fields (maximum energy 177.25 MeV) results in nearly the same cancer incidence as treating with one proton field (160 MeV). (c) Irradiation with protons using the spot scanning technique decreases the avoidable cancer incidence compared to photon treatment by a factor of about two. This result is independent of the number of beams used. Our work suggests that there are radiotherapy indications in which intensity-modulated treatments will result in little or no reduction of cancer incidence compared to conventional treatments. However, proton treatment can result in a lower cancer incidence than photon treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023601     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0382:craosc]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; S F Kry; Derek Z Yaldo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The effect of 6 and 15 MV on intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer treatment: plan evaluation, tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability analysis, and the theoretical risk of secondary induced malignancies.

Authors:  M Hussein; S Aldridge; T Guerrero Urbano; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  The concept and evolution of involved site radiation therapy for lymphoma.

Authors:  Lena Specht; Joachim Yahalom
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Preventing neurocognitive late effects in childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Martha A Askins; Bartlett D Moore
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Subsequent malignant neoplasms among children with Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Lisa Giulino-Roth; Qinglin Pei; Allen Buxton; Rizvan Bush; Yue Wu; Suzanne L Wolden; Louis S Constine; Kara M Kelly; Cindy L Schwartz; Debra L Friedman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 25.476

Review 6.  Radiation therapy planning with photons and protons for early and advanced breast cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Carmen Ares; Antony J Lomax; John M Kurtz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Modeling the risk of secondary malignancies after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features, pathobiology, and evolving approaches for mitigating risk.

Authors:  Steve Braunstein; Jean L Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Secondary neutron dose measurement for proton eye treatment using an eye snout with a borated neutron absorber.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Weon Kuu Chung; Jungwook Shin; Young Kyung Lim; Dongho Shin; Se Byeong Lee; Myongguen Yoon; Sung-Yong Park; Dong Oh Shin; Jung Keun Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Roger Hälg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.