Literature DB >> 11022367

Using severity-adjusted mortality to compare performance in a Veterans Affairs hospital and in private-sector hospitals.

H S Gordon1, D C Aron, S M Fuehrer, G E Rosenthal.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare hospital mortality in Veterans Affairs (VA) and private-sector patients. The study included 5016 patients admitted to 1 VA hospital. Admission severity of illness was measured using a commercial methodology that was developed in a nationwide database of 850,000 patients from 111 private-sector hospitals. The method uses data abstracted from patients' medical records to predict the risk of death in individual patients, based on the normative database. Analyses compared actual and predicted mortality rates in VA patients. VA patients had higher (P < .05) severity of illness than private-sector patients. The observed mortality rate in VA patients was 4.0% and was similar (P = .09) to the predicted risk of death (4.4%; 95% confidence interval 4.0-4.9%). In subgroup analyses, actual and predicted mortality rates were similar in medical and surgical patients and in groups stratified according to severity of illness, except in the highest severity stratum, in which actual mortality was lower than predicted mortality (57% vs 73%; P < .001). We found that in-hospital mortality in 1 VA hospital and a nationwide sample of private-sector hospitals were similar, after adjusting for severity of illness. Although not directly generalizable to other VA hospitals, our findings nonetheless suggest that the quality of VA and private-sector care may be similar with respect to one important and widely used measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11022367     DOI: 10.1177/106286060001500505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  6 in total

1.  Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Fee-based care is important for access to prompt treatment of hip fractures among veterans.

Authors:  Kelly K Richardson; Peter Cram; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mortality and length of stay in a veterans affairs hospital and private sector hospitals serving a common market.

Authors:  Gary E Rosenthal; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Dwain L Harper; Susan M Fuehrer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.

Authors:  Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Bonnie Wakefield; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  What Is Important in Selecting a Designated Hospital for the Korean Veterans with Hip Fractures?

Authors:  Bong-Ju Park; Hong-Man Cho; Yong-Suk Choi; Jae-Woong Seo
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-06-02

6.  One-year Survival Rates and Functional Recovery in Veterans Who Suffer from Hip Fractures: Evaluation of Commissioned Hospitals' System through Comparison between Veterans Hospitals and Commissioned Hospitals.

Authors:  Hong Man Cho; Jae Woong Seo; Hyun Ju Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.