PURPOSE: When oral anticancer agents are used for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer, compliance and feasibility become issues because of the long treatment time. Appropriate studies of these issues are lacking. We investigated compliance and feasibility during a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule of oral UFT (uracil-tegafur) over a period of 1 year administered as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A UFT dose of 600 mg/day was prescribed according to a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule to 87 patients after potentially curative resection. Compliance was investigated in three ways: physician interview, patient self-report, and chemical analysis of urine. The results were compared with the dose prescribed. Feasibility was evaluated on the basis of two indices: relative performance (RP), which was the ratio of the actual total dose taken to the total dose planned, and individual dose intensity (IDI), which was the ratio of the actual dose taken to the dose planned during a given period. RESULTS: The compliance assessed by physician interview and by patient self-report conformed well with the prescribed dose, the rate of agreement among the three compliance measures being more than 94%. Chemical analysis of urine in 38 of the patients revealed that they were actually taking the drug. The RP was 0.72, and the IDI was 0.8. CONCLUSION: From these results, the feasibility of the weekday-on/weekend-off schedule was judged to be good. It is suggested that the feasibility would be even better if the dose of UFT was set according to body surface area.
PURPOSE: When oral anticancer agents are used for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer, compliance and feasibility become issues because of the long treatment time. Appropriate studies of these issues are lacking. We investigated compliance and feasibility during a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule of oral UFT (uracil-tegafur) over a period of 1 year administered as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A UFT dose of 600 mg/day was prescribed according to a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule to 87 patients after potentially curative resection. Compliance was investigated in three ways: physician interview, patient self-report, and chemical analysis of urine. The results were compared with the dose prescribed. Feasibility was evaluated on the basis of two indices: relative performance (RP), which was the ratio of the actual total dose taken to the total dose planned, and individual dose intensity (IDI), which was the ratio of the actual dose taken to the dose planned during a given period. RESULTS: The compliance assessed by physician interview and by patient self-report conformed well with the prescribed dose, the rate of agreement among the three compliance measures being more than 94%. Chemical analysis of urine in 38 of the patients revealed that they were actually taking the drug. The RP was 0.72, and the IDI was 0.8. CONCLUSION: From these results, the feasibility of the weekday-on/weekend-off schedule was judged to be good. It is suggested that the feasibility would be even better if the dose of UFT was set according to body surface area.
Authors: Krishna Patel; Nathan R Foster; Ann Farrell; Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister; Josy Mathew; Brian Costello; John Reynolds; Jeffrey P Meyers; Aminah Jatoi Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Thomas M Atkinson; Vivian M Rodríguez; Mallorie Gordon; Isabelle K Avildsen; Jessica C Emanu; Sarah T Jewell; Kimberly A Anselmi; Pamela K Ginex Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Vicente F Gil-Guillen; Alejandro Balsa; Beatriz Bernárdez; Carmen Valdés Y Llorca; Emilio Márquez-Contreras; Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez; Jose M Castellano; Jesús Gómez-Martínez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: S Sadahiro; T Tsuchiya; K Sasaki; K Kondo; K Katsumata; G Nishimura; Y Kakeji; H Baba; S Sato; K Koda; Y Yamaguchi; T Morita; J Matsuoka; H Usuki; C Hamada; S Kodaira Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 32.976