Literature DB >> 11021541

A method for including protein flexibility in protein-ligand docking: improving tools for database mining and virtual screening.

H B Broughton1.   

Abstract

Second-generation methods for docking ligands into their biological receptors, such as FLOG, provide for flexibility of the ligand but not of the receptor. Molecular dynamics based methods, such as free energy perturbation, account for flexibility, solvent effects, etc., but are very time consuming. We combined the use of statistical analysis of conformational samples from short-run protein molecular dynamics with grid-based docking protocols and demonstrated improved performance in two test cases. Our statistical analysis explores the importance of the average strength of a potential interaction with the biological target and optionally applies a weighting depending on the variability in the strength of the interaction seen during dynamics simulation. Using these methods, we improved the num-top-ranked 10% of a database of drug-like molecules, in searches based on the three-dimensional structure of the protein. These methods are able to match the ability of manual docking to assess likely inactivity on steric grounds and indeed to rank order ligands from a homologous series of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors with good correlation to their true activity. Furthermore, these methods reduce the need for human intervention in setting up molecular docking experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021541     DOI: 10.1016/s1093-3263(00)00036-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Graph Model        ISSN: 1093-3263            Impact factor:   2.518


  12 in total

1.  Identifying the binding mode of a molecular scaffold.

Authors:  Doron Chema; Doron Eren; Avner Yayon; Amiram Goldblum; Andrea Zaliani
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ferrari; Binqing Q Wei; Luca Costantino; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Efficient molecular docking of NMR structures: application to HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.

Authors:  G Madhavi Sastry; Matvey Adzhigirey; Tyler Day; Ramakrishna Annabhimoju; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Computer-aided drug-discovery techniques that account for receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Jacob D Durrant; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  Molecular docking screens using comparative models of proteins.

Authors:  Hao Fan; John J Irwin; Benjamin M Webb; Gerhard Klebe; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Identification of xenoestrogens in food additives by an integrated in silico and in vitro approach.

Authors:  Alessio Amadasi; Andrea Mozzarelli; Clara Meda; Adriana Maggi; Pietro Cozzini
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 9.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins.

Authors:  Stewart A Adcock; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.