Literature DB >> 11021045

Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: results from a national survey.

A C Wagenaar1, E M Harwood, T L Toomey, C E Denk, K M Zander.   

Abstract

We surveyed the U.S. non-institutionalized population age 18+ on opinions regarding 23 alcohol control policies (N = 7,021). The cooperation rate among contacted households was 70% and the overall response rate was 54%. Results showed high levels of public support for most alcohol control policies. Over 80% support restrictions on alcohol use in public places, such as parks, beaches, concert venues, and on college campuses. Eighty-two percent support increased alcohol taxes, provided the funds are used for treatment or prevention programs. Over 60% support alcohol advertising and promotion restrictions, such as banning billboard advertising, banning promotion at sporting events, or banning liquor and beer advertising on television. Multivariate regression analyses indicated significant relationships between alcohol policy opinions and a variety of sociodemographic, political orientation, and behavioral measures. However, the absolute differences in alcohol policy support across groups is small. There is a strong base of support for alcohol control policies in the U.S., and such support is found among whites and ethnics of color, young and old, rich and poor, and conservatives, moderates, and liberals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  18 in total

1.  Joe Camel in a bottle: Diageo, the Smirnoff brand, and the transformation of the youth alcohol market.

Authors:  James F Mosher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A cross-sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity-related advertising.

Authors:  Antronette K Yancey; Brian L Cole; Rochelle Brown; Jerome D Williams; Amy Hillier; Randolph S Kline; Marice Ashe; Sonya A Grier; Desiree Backman; William J McCarthy
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.

Authors:  Randy W Elder; Briana Lawrence; Aneeqah Ferguson; Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Traci L Toomey; Jonathan E Fielding
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Patterns of change in implementation of state alcohol control policies in the United States, 1999-2011.

Authors:  Toben F Nelson; Ziming Xuan; Jason G Blanchette; Timothy C Heeren; Timothy S Naimi
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Increasing support for alcohol-control enforcement through news coverage of alcohol's role in injuries and crime.

Authors:  Michael D Slater; Andrew F Hayes; Catherine E Goodall; David R Ewoldsen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Media influence on alcohol-control policy support in the U.S. adult population: the intervening role of issue concern and risk judgments.

Authors:  Michael D Slater; Frank Lawrence; Maria Leonora G Comello
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009 Apr-May

7.  A tale of two cities: the effect of extended drinking hours in licensed establishments on impaired driving and assault charges.

Authors:  Evelyn Vingilis; A Ian Mcleod; Robert E Mann; Jane Seeley
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.491

8.  An exploratory approach to analyzing alcohol control policy opinions held by Ontario adults.

Authors:  Anca R Ialomiteanu; Norman Giesbrecht; Edward M Adlaf; Hyacinth Irving; Angela Paglia-Boak; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Local Support for Alcohol Control Policies and Perceptions of Neighborhood Issues in Two College Communities.

Authors:  Anne M Fairlie; William DeJong; Mark D Wood
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  Injury news coverage, relative concern, and support for alcohol-control policies: an impersonal impact explanation.

Authors:  Michael D Slater; Andrew F Hayes; Adrienne H Chung
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.