Literature DB >> 11021043

Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates.

M S Givel1, S A Glantz.   

Abstract

In 1979 and 1980 in Dade County, Florida, a small grassroots advocacy group, Group Against Smoking Pollution (GASP), attempted to enact a clean indoor air ordinance through the initiative process. The tobacco industry's successful efforts to defeat the initiatives were expensive high-tech media-centered campaigns. Even though GASP's electoral resources were extremely limited for both initiatives, GASP utilized similar media-centered tactics. This approach attempted to defeat the tobacco industry in its own venue, in spite of the tobacco industry's vastly greater resources. Nevertheless, the industry defeated these ordinances by narrow margins because of broad voter support for the initiatives before the industry started its campaigns. Health advocates will never have the resources to match the tobacco industry in expensive high-tech media-centered initiative campaigns. Rather, their power lies in the general popularity of tobacco control legislation and their ability to mobilize broad grassroots efforts combined with an adequately funded media campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  7 in total

1.  E-cigarette Policymaking by Local and State Governments: 2009-2014.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cox; Rachel Ann Barry; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  When tobacco targets direct democracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Laposata; Allison P Kennedy; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places.

Authors:  J V Dearlove; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.

Authors:  M S Givel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Support for smoke-free policies: a nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002.

Authors:  Theresa L Osypuk; Dolores Acevedo-Garcia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Defeating JUUL's Effort to Rewrite San Francisco's E-Cigarette Regulations.

Authors:  Neiloy R Sircar; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents.

Authors:  Joshua Miller; Maya Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.