PURPOSE:Thiazide diuretics reduce urine calcium excretion and might therefore reduce postmenopausal bone loss. In some, but not all, case-control studies, their use has been associated with a reduced incidence of hip fractures. We studied the effects of hydrochlorothiazide on bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, 2-year trial of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) and placebo on bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women. Participants were not required to have either low bone mineral density or hypertension. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS:One hundred eighty-five women entered the study, of whom 138 completed 2 years of follow-up. In an intention-to-treat analysis, hydrochlorothiazide produced significant benefits on bone mineral density of the total body (between-group difference at 2 years of 0.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 1.3%, P <0.0001), legs (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 1.7%, P <0.0001), mid-forearm (1.2%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 2.2%, P = 0.02), and ultradistal forearm (1.7%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 3.2%, P = 0.04). There was no effect in the lumbar spine (0.5%, 95% CI: -0.5% to 1.6%) or femoral neck (0.2%, 95% CI: 1.3% to 1.7%). The between-group changes tended to be greatest during the first 6 months, except in the mid-forearm where there appeared to be a progressive divergence. An as-treated analysis produced similar results. Urine calcium excretion and indices of bone turnover decreased in the thiazide group, but parathyroid hormone concentrations did not differ between the groups. Treatment was tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS:Hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) slows cortical bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. It may act directly on bone as well as on the renal tubule. The small size of the effect suggests that thiazides may have a role in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, but that they are not an appropriate monotherapy for treating osteoporosis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Thiazide diuretics reduce urine calcium excretion and might therefore reduce postmenopausal bone loss. In some, but not all, case-control studies, their use has been associated with a reduced incidence of hip fractures. We studied the effects of hydrochlorothiazide on bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, 2-year trial of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) and placebo on bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women. Participants were not required to have either low bone mineral density or hypertension. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five women entered the study, of whom 138 completed 2 years of follow-up. In an intention-to-treat analysis, hydrochlorothiazide produced significant benefits on bone mineral density of the total body (between-group difference at 2 years of 0.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3% to 1.3%, P <0.0001), legs (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 1.7%, P <0.0001), mid-forearm (1.2%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 2.2%, P = 0.02), and ultradistal forearm (1.7%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 3.2%, P = 0.04). There was no effect in the lumbar spine (0.5%, 95% CI: -0.5% to 1.6%) or femoral neck (0.2%, 95% CI: 1.3% to 1.7%). The between-group changes tended to be greatest during the first 6 months, except in the mid-forearm where there appeared to be a progressive divergence. An as-treated analysis produced similar results. Urine calcium excretion and indices of bone turnover decreased in the thiazide group, but parathyroid hormone concentrations did not differ between the groups. Treatment was tolerated well. CONCLUSIONS:Hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg per day) slows cortical bone loss in normal postmenopausal women. It may act directly on bone as well as on the renal tubule. The small size of the effect suggests that thiazides may have a role in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, but that they are not an appropriate monotherapy for treating osteoporosis.
Authors: Karen L Margolis; Lisa Palermo; Eric Vittinghoff; Gregory W Evans; Hal H Atkinson; Bruce P Hamilton; Robert G Josse; Patrick J O'Connor; Debra L Simmons; Margaret Tiktin; Ann V Schwartz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joshua I Barzilay; Barry R Davis; Sara L Pressel; Alokananda Ghosh; Rachel Puttnam; Karen L Margolis; Paul K Whelton Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Hye Ryoun Jang; Jay Wook Lee; Sejoong Kim; Nam Ju Heo; Jeong Hwan Lee; Hyo Sang Kim; Ji Yong Jung; Yun Kyu Oh; Ki Young Na; Jin Suk Han; Kwon Wook Joo Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Hye Ryoun Jang; Sejoong Kim; Nam Ju Heo; Jeong Hwan Lee; Hyo Sang Kim; Søren Nielsen; Un Sil Jeon; Yun Kyu Oh; Ki Young Na; Kwon Wook Joo; Jin Suk Han Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 2.153