Literature DB >> 11019845

Effect of gastrointestinal inflammation and age on the pharmacokinetics of oral microemulsion cyclosporin A in the first month after bone marrow transplantation.

K R Schultz1, T J Nevill, R F Balshaw, C L Toze, T Corr, C J Currie, D K Strong, P A Keown.   

Abstract

Cyclosporin A (CsA) absorption is highly variable in BMT patients. Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA, permits increased absorption with less variable pharmacokinetic parameters in non-BMT patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of CsA after BMT in patients received microemulsion CsA. Two oral doses of 3mg/kg were given 48 h apart between 14 and 28 days after allogeneic BMT in 20 adults, and one dose in seven children, while subjects were receiving a continuous i.v. infusion of CsA. Whole blood samples were taken throughout the dosing interval to calculate the incremental CsA exposure using maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), concentration at 12 h after the dose (C12), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and to establish inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. Drug exposure was substantially lower in children than adults, with an AUC of 861+/-805 vs 2629+/-1487 micromg x h/l (P = 0.001), respectively, and absorption was delayed and diminished in both groups by comparison with solid organ recipients. Intra-patient variability in adults for AUC was high at 0.59+/-0.34, while inter-patient variability, measured as the coefficient of variation (c.v.), was 0.55 for the first and 0.54 for the second dose. In adults, gastrointestinal (GI) inflammation due to either mucositis or GVHD resulted in a higher AUC of 3077+/-1551 microg x h/l compared to 1795+/-973 microg x h/l (P = 0.02), and a similar trend was observed in children. AUC seemed little affected by the CsA formulation (liquid or capsule), or co-administration with liquids or food. Trough (12 h) CsA levels correlated poorly with incremental AUC. Sparse sample modeling of the AUC using two-point predictors taken at 2.5 and 5 h after dosing accurately approximated AUC in adults (r2 = 0.94), while 1.5 and 5 h was superior in children (r2 = 0.98). These data suggest that 12 h postdose trough measurements of CsA may not be the most appropriate way to evaluate CsA blood concentrations in order to establish therapeutic efficacy in BMT patients. Based on this study, the dose of microemulsion CsA should be adjusted based on recipient age, and the presence of GI inflammation secondary to mucositis or GVHD. These data would suggest that sparse sampling at time points earlier than the trough more accurately reflects the AUC and may correlate more closely with therapeutic efficacy early post-BMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11019845     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  11 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation with emphasis on limited sampling strategy.

Authors:  Abraham J Wilhelm; Peer de Graaf; Agnes I Veldkamp; Jeroen J W M Janssen; Peter C Huijgens; Eleonora L Swart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A J Wagstaff; C M Perry; G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Methotrexate dose delivery is more important than ciclosporin level in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following T-replete reduced-intensity sibling allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Patrick Medd; Ian Monk; Robert Danby; Ram Malladi; Ruth Clifford; Amanda Ellis; David Roberts; Chris Hatton; Paresh Vyas; Tim Littlewood; Andy Peniket
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Ciclosporin kinetics in children after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A J Willemze; S C Cremers; R C Schoemaker; A C Lankester; J den Hartigh; J Burggraaf; J M Vossen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Single-dose daily infusion of cyclosporine for prevention of Graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA allele-matched, unrelated donors.

Authors:  Yuichiro Nawa; Masamichi Hara; Kazushi Tanimoto; Koichi Nakase; Teruhiko Kozuka; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration.

Authors:  Hanene Eljebari; Nadia Ben Fradj; Issam Salouage; Emna Gaies; Sameh Trabelsi; Nadia Jebabli; Mohamed Lakhal; Tarek Ben Othman; Anis Kouz
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-10-26

8.  Bayesian Networks: A New Approach to Predict Therapeutic Range Achievement of Initial Cyclosporine Blood Concentration After Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Vincent Leclerc; Michel Ducher; Nathalie Bleyzac
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2018-03

9.  An experimental study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic aspect of Lekhana Basti (Emaciating/ Desiccating Medicated Enema).

Authors:  Swapnil S Auti; B K Ashok; Anup B Thakar; V J Shukla; B Ravishankar
Journal:  Anc Sci Life       Date:  2011-10

10.  Bayesian approach for the estimation of cyclosporine area under the curve using limited sampling strategies in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sarem Sarem; Jun Li; Olivier Barriere; Catherine Litalien; Yves Théorêt; Anne-Laure Lapeyraque; Fahima Nekka
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.