Literature DB >> 11018858

Natural residues versus antiretroviral drug-selected mutations in HIV type 1 group O reverse transcriptase and protease related to virological drug failure in vivo.

M P de Baar1, W Janssens, A de Ronde, K Fransen, R Colebunders, L Kestens, G van der Groen, J Goudsmit.   

Abstract

HIV-1 group O viruses were first recognized as a distinct subgroup of HIV-1 with the isolation and characterization in 1990 of a virus (ANT70) from a woman (individual A) and her spouse (individual B), both from Cameroon (De Leys R, et al.: J Virol 1990;64:1207-1216). During the 5-6 years before treatment, individual A remained asymptomatic, with viral RNA levels between 2.5 and 2.8 log10 copies/ml, as measured by a newly developed group O-specific quantitative NASBA-based RNA assay. Individual B developed mild clinical symptoms, with 3.1 to 3.6 log10 copies of viral RNA per milliliter. HIV-1 sequences obtained from both individuals showed pretreatment residues in protease that confer resistance to protease inhibitors in group M viruses (10I, 36I, and 71V). Individual A showed an initial response to AZT, but shortly after addition of ddC and saquinavir, the RNA levels returned to baseline, while subsequent treatment with d4T, 3TC, and indinavir reduced the RNA level to less than 50 copies/ml for the time of follow-up. Individual B showed no response to AZT or ddC monotherapy, and a change to d4T, 3TC, and indinavir had, in contrast to individual A, only a temporary effect. While a multitude of mutations in HIV-1 group O reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease appeared that are associated with drug resistance in group M viruses, the observed T215N mutation in RT and the V15I and V22A mutations in protease have not previously been described and may represent resistance-conferring mutations specific to group O viruses. These results indicate that treatment of HIV-1 group O-infected individuals with antiretroviral drug regimens that include protease inhibitors might lead to rapid selection for resistance-conferring mutations. This probably results from preexisting protease residues contributing to reduced sensitivity of group O viruses to protease inhibitors, as is observed in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11018858     DOI: 10.1089/08892220050140937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses        ISSN: 0889-2229            Impact factor:   2.205


  8 in total

1.  Baseline genotypic and phenotypic susceptibilities of HIV-1 group O to enfuvirtide.

Authors:  Agnès Depatureaux; Charlotte Charpentier; Gilles Collin; Marie Leoz; Diane Descamps; Aurélia Vessière; Florence Damond; Dominique Rousset; Françoise Brun-Vézinet; Jean-Christophe Plantier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  HIV-1 Group O Genotypes and Phenotypes: Relationship to Fitness and Susceptibility to Antiretroviral Drugs.

Authors:  Denis M Tebit; Hamish Patel; Annette Ratcliff; Elodie Alessandri; Joseph Liu; Crystal Carpenter; Jean-Christophe Plantier; Eric J Arts
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  Rapid assessment of phenotypic resistance to protease inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O.

Authors:  Berta Rodés; Eva Poveda; Vincent Soriano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Non-M variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  Thomas Mourez; François Simon; Jean-Christophe Plantier
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Combination of candidate microbicides cellulose acetate 1,2-benzenedicarboxylate and UC781 has synergistic and complementary effects against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.

Authors:  Shuwen Liu; Hong Lu; A Robert Neurath; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Single rapid real-time monitored isothermal RNA amplification assay for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from groups M, N, and O.

Authors:  M P de Baar; M W van Dooren; E de Rooij; M Bakker; B van Gemen; J Goudsmit; A de Ronde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  HIV-1 group O integrase displays lower enzymatic efficiency and higher susceptibility to raltegravir than HIV-1 group M subtype B integrase.

Authors:  Agnès Depatureaux; Peter K Quashie; Thibault Mesplède; Yingshan Han; Hannah Koubi; Jean-Christophe Plantier; Maureen Oliveira; Daniela Moisi; Bluma Brenner; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The frameshift stimulatory signal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O is a pseudoknot.

Authors:  Martin Baril; Dominic Dulude; Sergey V Steinberg; Léa Brakier-Gingras
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.