OBJECTIVES: To perform a comparative evaluation and follow-up of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who were treated with intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs, starting with simple drugs and advancing to complex combinations. METHODS: The study included 625 patients, 26 to 85 years old, with ED. Four intracavernous injection protocols were used: protocol 1, papaverine plus phentolamine; protocol 2, prostaglandin E(1); protocol 3, papaverine, phentolamine, and prostaglandin E(1); and protocol 4, atropine sulfate, papaverine, phentolamine, and prostaglandin E(1). A positive response was defined as an erection sufficient for penetration. Patients for whom the basic protocol failed were successively switched to the more advanced protocols until a positive response was achieved. RESULTS: A positive response was achieved by 415 (66.4%) of the 625 patients given protocol 1; 75 (36%) of the remaining 210 patients given protocol 2; 98 (72.6%) of the 135 patients given protocol 3; and 22 (59.5%) of 37 patients given protocol 4. All four protocols failed in only 15 patients (2. 4%). At the 3-year follow-up visit (n = 610), 349 had achieved coitus, 65 (10.6%) without an injection and 202 (33.1%) with an injection. Eighty-two patients sometimes performed coitus without an injection. Sixty-three patients (10.3%) abandoned the program because of marital or health problems; 198 asked to be switched to Viagra during the follow-up period, and 120 returned to the program. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our progressive treatment yielded a high positive response rate (97.6%), with 57.2% achieving successful coitus on follow-up. The main advantage of the program is that it spares patients who are responsive earlier from using more complex, painful, and costly drugs.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a comparative evaluation and follow-up of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who were treated with intracavernous injection of vasoactive drugs, starting with simple drugs and advancing to complex combinations. METHODS: The study included 625 patients, 26 to 85 years old, with ED. Four intracavernous injection protocols were used: protocol 1, papaverine plus phentolamine; protocol 2, prostaglandin E(1); protocol 3, papaverine, phentolamine, and prostaglandin E(1); and protocol 4, atropine sulfate, papaverine, phentolamine, and prostaglandin E(1). A positive response was defined as an erection sufficient for penetration. Patients for whom the basic protocol failed were successively switched to the more advanced protocols until a positive response was achieved. RESULTS: A positive response was achieved by 415 (66.4%) of the 625 patients given protocol 1; 75 (36%) of the remaining 210 patients given protocol 2; 98 (72.6%) of the 135 patients given protocol 3; and 22 (59.5%) of 37 patients given protocol 4. All four protocols failed in only 15 patients (2. 4%). At the 3-year follow-up visit (n = 610), 349 had achieved coitus, 65 (10.6%) without an injection and 202 (33.1%) with an injection. Eighty-two patients sometimes performed coitus without an injection. Sixty-three patients (10.3%) abandoned the program because of marital or health problems; 198 asked to be switched to Viagra during the follow-up period, and 120 returned to the program. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our progressive treatment yielded a high positive response rate (97.6%), with 57.2% achieving successful coitus on follow-up. The main advantage of the program is that it spares patients who are responsive earlier from using more complex, painful, and costly drugs.