Literature DB >> 11018614

Comparison of artificial urinary sphincter and collagen for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence.

D D Kuznetsov1, H L Kim, R V Patel, G D Steinberg, G T Bales.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare how urinary symptoms affect the quality of life in groups of men with postprostatectomy incontinence treated with collagen versus artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
METHODS: Two cohorts of men, one which received urethral collagen injection and one artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, were surveyed with a validated quality-of-life questionnaire to assess how their urinary dysfunction impacted their daily activities. The mean impact score and bother score for the two groups were compared. In addition, the overall degree of continence between the groups was assessed.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 19 months, 8 (20%) of 41 patients treated with collagen injections were at least socially continent, requiring one pad daily or less. In comparison, 27 (75%) of 36 men treated with an AUS were at least socially continent (P <0.001). Both the impact score and the bother score from the quality-of-life questionnaire were significantly lower in the group treated with the AUS than in the group treated with collagen.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving an AUS achieved significantly higher continence rates. Also, the quality of life of men treated with an AUS was improved compared with that of the men treated with collagen injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11018614     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00723-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Combination surgery for erectile dysfunction and male incontinence.

Authors:  Dominic Lee; O Lenaine Westney; Run Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Vivienne Kirchin; Tobias Page; Phil E Keegan; Kofi Om Atiemo; June D Cody; Samuel McClinton; Patricia Aluko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 4.  [Diagnosis and surgical treatment of postprostatectomy stress incontinence: recommendation of the working group Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau].

Authors:  R M Bauer; C Hampel; A Haferkamp; K Höfner; W Hübner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Flynn; George D Webster
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 6.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Critical urologic skills and procedures in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maria R Ramos-Fernandez; Roberto Medero-Colon; Lorraine Mendez-Carreno
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The use of Duloxetine in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Klaus G Fink; Johannes Huber; Erich Würnschimmel; Nikolaus T Schmeller
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

9.  Slings in iatrogenic male incontinence: Current status.

Authors:  Fabrizio Gallo; M Schenone; C Giberti
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

10.  Male incontinence: Pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.