Literature DB >> 11018201

Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade.

F A Cura1, S R Kapadia, P L L'Allier, J P Schneider, M S Kreindel, M J Silver, J S Yadav, C C Simpfendorfer, R R Raymond, E M Tuzcu, I Franco, P L Whitlow, E J Topol, S G Ellis.   

Abstract

We compared in-hospital femoral complications of Angio-Seal, Perclose, and manual compression in consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet inhibition. Femoral closure devices have a similar overall risk profile as manual compression, even in patients treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet inhibition, although certain rare complications such as retroperitoneal hemorrhage and severe access-site infection may be more common with the use of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11018201     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01081-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Femoral hemostasis.

Authors:  H J Semler
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

2.  Rare adverse event monitoring of medical devices with the use of an automated surveillance tool.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Nipun Arora; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 3.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Salvatore Cassese; Maryam Linhardt; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Comparison of Exo-Seal(®) and Angio-Seal (®) for arterial puncture site closure: A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial.

Authors:  Johannes Ketterle; Harald Rittger; Inga Helmig; Lutz Klinghammer; Stefan Zimmermann; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Johannes Brachmann; Holger Nef; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Schlundt
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  A cost-minimization analysis of the angio-seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Nipun Arora; Michael Matheny; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The frequency of vascular complications associated with the use of vascular closure devices varies by indication for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Emilia Stegemann; Rainer Hoffmann; Steven Marso; Berthold Stegemann; Nikolaus Marx; Thomas Lauer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Montalescot; H R Andersen; D Antoniucci; A Betriu; M J de Boer; L Grip; F J Neumann; M T Rothman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device following carotid artery stenting under clopidogrel platelet blockade.

Authors:  Niels Zorger; Thomas Finkenzeller; Markus Lenhart; Okka Hamer; Christian Paetzel; Inghita Borisch; Ingolf Toepel; Stefan Feuerbach; Johann Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Vascular closure device failure: frequency and implications: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Nipun Arora; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.