Literature DB >> 11017980

Grievances against physicians: 11 years' experience of a medical society grievance committee.

E C Halperin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand causes of patient dissatisfaction that result in complaints.
DESIGN: Grievances received by the grievance committee between January 1, 1989, and January 1, 2000, were reviewed.
SETTING: A 2-county area of North Carolina.
SUBJECTS: Of 29 patients who filed grievances, the 9 male (31%) and 20 female (69%) patients had a mean (+/-SD) age of 39 (+/-19) years. In 18 instances, the patient consulted the physician less than 3 times (64%) before the complaint and in 8 instances more than 4 times (29%). Main outcome measures Allegations of the grievance and the committee's findings.
RESULTS: Grievances fell into 5 categories: failure to fulfill expectations for examination and treatment (38%), failure to promptly diagnose (20%), rudeness (17%), producing excessive pain or practicing beyond the area of expertise (13%), and inappropriate behavior related to billings (10%). In 45% of the grievances, the committee found no breach of practice standards. In 17% of the cases, the physician resolved the grievance by apologizing, adjusting a bill, or completing insurance forms.
CONCLUSION: Most grievances were filed by younger women against newly encountered physicians and were related to inadequate communication or alleged delay in diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11017980      PMCID: PMC1071099          DOI: 10.1136/ewjm.173.4.235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  9 in total

1.  Resolving disagreements in the patient-physician relationship: tools for improving communication in managed care.

Authors:  W Levinson; R Gorawara-Bhat; R Dueck; B Egener; A Kao; C Kerr; B Lo; D Perry; K Pollitz; S Reifsteck; T Stein; J Santa; M Kemp-White
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III.

Authors:  A R Localio; A G Lawthers; T A Brennan; N M Laird; L E Hebert; L M Peterson; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Formal complaints against general practitioners: a study of 1000 cases.

Authors:  C Owen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Formal complaints and disciplinary proceedings involving medical practitioners: recent developments in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  S A Buetow
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  1995

5.  Accounts of disagreements with doctors.

Authors:  E Annandale; K Hunt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Prevalence and sources of patients' unmet expectations for care.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan; D Paterniti; D Antonius; M Dunham; C E Lewis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Grievance committee: necessary evil or PR plus.

Authors:  L H Johnson
Journal:  Natl Conf Dent Public Relat       Date:  1968-08-05

8.  The Grievance Committee: an asset for organized medicine--experiences of the Charleston County Medical Society.

Authors:  L Banov
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  1980-06

9.  Purposes, rules and procedure of the Grievance Committee, Indiana State Medical Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Indiana State Med Assoc       Date:  1972-01
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of complaints to a tertiary care pain clinic over a nine-year period.

Authors:  Angela Mailis-Gagnon; Keith Nicholson; Luis Chaparro
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Alex Gillespie; Jane Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 7.035

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.