BACKGROUND: Testing for mutations of the TP53 gene in tumors is a valuable predictor for disease outcome in certain cancers, but the time and cost of conventional sequencing limit its use. The present study compares traditional sequencing with the much faster microarray sequencing on a commercially available chip and describes a method to increase the specificity of the chip. METHODS: DNA from 140 human bladder tumors was extracted and subjected to a multiplex-PCR before loading onto the p53 GeneChip from Affymetrix. The same samples were previously sequenced by manual dideoxy sequencing. In addition, two cell lines with two different homozygous mutations at the TP53 gene locus were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1464 gene chip positions, each of which corresponded to an analyzed nucleotide in the sequence, 251 had background signals that were not attributable to mutations, causing the specificity of mutation calling without mathematical correction to be low. This problem was solved by regarding each chip position as a separate entity with its own noise and threshold characteristics. The use of background plus 2 SD as the cutoff improved the specificity from 0.34 to 0.86 at the cost of a reduced sensitivity, from 0.92 to 0.84, leading to a much better concordance (92%) with results obtained by traditional sequencing. The chip method detected as little as 1% mutated DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray-based sequencing is a novel option to assess TP53 mutations, representing a fast and inexpensive method compared with conventional sequencing.
BACKGROUND: Testing for mutations of the TP53 gene in tumors is a valuable predictor for disease outcome in certain cancers, but the time and cost of conventional sequencing limit its use. The present study compares traditional sequencing with the much faster microarray sequencing on a commercially available chip and describes a method to increase the specificity of the chip. METHODS: DNA from 140 humanbladder tumors was extracted and subjected to a multiplex-PCR before loading onto the p53 GeneChip from Affymetrix. The same samples were previously sequenced by manual dideoxy sequencing. In addition, two cell lines with two different homozygous mutations at the TP53 gene locus were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1464 gene chip positions, each of which corresponded to an analyzed nucleotide in the sequence, 251 had background signals that were not attributable to mutations, causing the specificity of mutation calling without mathematical correction to be low. This problem was solved by regarding each chip position as a separate entity with its own noise and threshold characteristics. The use of background plus 2 SD as the cutoff improved the specificity from 0.34 to 0.86 at the cost of a reduced sensitivity, from 0.92 to 0.84, leading to a much better concordance (92%) with results obtained by traditional sequencing. The chip method detected as little as 1% mutated DNA. CONCLUSIONS: Microarray-based sequencing is a novel option to assess TP53 mutations, representing a fast and inexpensive method compared with conventional sequencing.
Authors: Neeme Tõnisson; Jana Zernant; Ants Kurg; Hendrik Pavel; Georg Slavin; Hanno Roomere; Aune Meiel; Pierre Hainaut; Andres Metspalu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hanna Pincas; Maneesh R Pingle; Jianmin Huang; Kaiqin Lao; Philip B Paty; Alan M Friedman; Francis Barany Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-10-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Nicholas D Socci; Lee Richstone; Marta Corton; Nille Behrendt; Julia Wulkfuhle; Bernard Bochner; Emmanuel Petricoin; Carlos Cordon-Cardo Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M Luana Poeta; Judith Manola; Meredith A Goldwasser; Arlene Forastiere; Nicole Benoit; Joseph A Califano; John A Ridge; Jarrard Goodwin; Daniel Kenady; John Saunders; William Westra; David Sidransky; Wayne M Koch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicole Y Fang; Timothy C Greiner; Dennis D Weisenburger; Wing C Chan; Julie M Vose; Lynette M Smith; James O Armitage; R Aeryn Mayer; Brian L Pike; Francis S Collins; Joseph G Hacia Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anirban Maitra; Yoram Cohen; Susannah E D Gillespie; Elizabeth Mambo; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Mohammad O Hoque; Nila Shah; Michael Goggins; Joseph Califano; David Sidransky; Aravinda Chakravarti Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 9.043