Literature DB >> 11016560

Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences.

J R Booth1, B MacWhinney, Y Harasaki.   

Abstract

Children aged 8 through 11 (N = 250) were given a word-by-word sentence task in both the visual and auditory modes. The sentences included an object relative clause, a subject relative clause, or a conjoined verb phrase. Each sentence was followed by a true-false question, testing the subject of either the first or second verb. Participants were also given two memory span measures: digit span and reading span. High digit span children slowed down more at the transition from the main to the relative clause than did the low digit span children. The findings suggest the presence of a U-shaped learning pattern for on-line processing of restrictive relative clauses. Off-line accuracy scores showed different patterns for good comprehenders and poor comprehenders. Poor comprehenders answered the second verb questions at levels that were consistently below chance. Their answers were based on an incorrect local attachment strategy that treated the second noun as the subject of the second verb. For example, they often answered yes to the question "The girl chases the policeman" after the object relative sentence "The boy that the girl sees chases the policeman." Interestingly, low memory span poor comprehenders used the local attachment strategy less consistently than high memory span poor comprehenders, and all poor comprehenders used this strategy less consistently for harder than for easier sentences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11016560     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  20 in total

1.  Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses.

Authors:  Fabrizio Arosio; Maria Teresa Guasti; Natale Stucchi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

2.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Context Effect on L2 Word Recognition: Visual Versus Auditory Modalities.

Authors:  Essa Batel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-04

4.  The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: a real-time investigation.

Authors:  Tracy E Love
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-05

5.  Revise and resubmit: how real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition.

Authors:  Lucia Pozzan; John C Trueswell
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The processing and interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis constructions by children at normal and slowed speech rates.

Authors:  Sarah M Callahan; Matthew Walenski; Tracy Love
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Slowed speech input has a differential impact on on-line and off-line processing in children's comprehension of pronouns.

Authors:  Tracy Love; Matthew Walenski; David Swinney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-03

8.  Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

Authors:  Justine B Wells; Morten H Christiansen; David S Race; Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Examining the Relationship Between Word Reading Efficiency and Oral Reading Rate in Predicting Comprehension Among Different Types of Readers.

Authors:  Sarah H Eason; John Sabatini; Lindsay Goldberg; Kelly Bruce; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2013-05-01

10.  Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.