Literature DB >> 11015562

Phenotypic differences in cardiovascular regulation in inbred rat models of aerobic capacity.

L G Koch1, S L Britton, J C Barbato, D W Rodenbaugh, S E DiCarlo.   

Abstract

The Dark Aouti (DA) inbred strain of rats has superior aerobic treadmill running capacity compared with the Copenhagen (COP) strain of inbred rats. This difference in aerobic capacity provides a model to explore the genetic basis of variation in this trait. The present study evaluated intermediate phenotypic differences between 10 male COP inbred rats and 10 male DA inbred rats that might contribute to the difference in aerobic capacity between the strains. Five autonomically regulated cardiovascular variables were evaluated during rest or exercise by measuring the response to autonomic antagonists. The DA rat had enhanced autonomic function for the regulation of peripheral blood flow and cardiac output. Specifically, at rest the DA rats had significantly more sympathetic (123 +/- 8 vs. 99 +/- 7 beats/min) and parasympathetic (35 +/- 5 vs. 12 +/- 3 beats/min) tonus for heart rate control and more sympathetic support of blood pressure (70 +/- 7 vs. 38 +/- 6 mmHg) compared with the COP rats. During three graded levels of treadmill exercise the DA rats had higher blood pressures (16% on average) and higher heart rates (4% on average) relative to the COP rats. In addition, the DA rats had a 27% greater heart weight-to-body weight ratio compared with the COP strain of rats (3.63 +/- 0.08 vs. 2.85 +/- 0.07 g/kg). All five of these intermediate phenotypes could participate as variables causative of the difference in treadmill running capacity between the DA and COP strains of rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11015562     DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.1999.1.2.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  8 in total

1.  Genetic variances and covariances of aerobic metabolic rates in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Bernard Wone; Michael W Sears; Marta K Labocha; Edward R Donovan; Jack P Hayes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of a complex housing environment on heart rate and blood pressure of rats at rest and after stressful challenges.

Authors:  Jody Sharp; Toni Azar; David Lawson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Cardiac performance in inbred rat genetic models of low and high running capacity.

Authors:  J Chen; G M Feller; J C Barbato; S Periyasamy; Z J Xie; L G Koch; J I Shapiro; S L Britton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Sex modifies exercise and cardiac adaptation in mice.

Authors:  John P Konhilas; Alexander H Maass; Stephen W Luckey; Brian L Stauffer; Eric N Olson; Leslie A Leinwand
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Rats selectively bred for differences in aerobic capacity have similar hypertensive responses to chronic intermittent hypoxia.

Authors:  Amanda L Sharpe; Mary Ann Andrade; Myrna Herrera-Rosales; Steven L Britton; Lauren G Koch; Glenn M Toney
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  The potential role of aerobic exercise to modulate cardiotoxicity of molecularly targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Jessica M Scott; Susan Lakoski; John R Mackey; Pamela S Douglas; Mark J Haykowsky; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-01-18

7.  Selection for aerobic capacity affects corticosterone, monoamines and wheel-running activity.

Authors:  R P Waters; K J Renner; R B Pringle; Cliff H Summers; S L Britton; L G Koch; J G Swallow
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-01-26

Review 8.  Inter-individual variation in adaptations to endurance and resistance exercise training: genetic approaches towards understanding a complex phenotype.

Authors:  Heather L Vellers; Steven R Kleeberger; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.957

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.