Literature DB >> 11015093

Surgical treatment of anorectal complications in Crohn's disease.

F Michelassi1, M Melis, M Rubin, R D Hurst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to elucidate features, surgical procedures, and long-term results in patients with anorectal complications of Crohn's disease.
METHODS: Physical findings, surgical treatment, and long-term outcome were recorded prospectively for 224 patients who had anorectal complications of Crohn's disease between October 1984 and May 1999.
RESULTS: Presenting complications included abscess (n = 36), fistula-in-ano (n = 51), rectovaginal fistula (n = 20), anal stenosis (n = 40), anal incontinence (n = 11), or a combination of features (n = 66). Twenty-four patients did not undergo surgical treatment; the remaining 200 patients underwent 284 procedures. Ultimately, 139 patients (62%) retained anorectal function; reasons for proctectomy in the remaining 85 patients included disease (n = 66), extensive fistular disease (n = 15), fecal incontinence (n = 2), and tight anal stenosis (n = 1). Patients with rectal disease had a significantly higher rate of proctectomy than patients with rectal sparing (77.6% vs. 13.6%, respectively, P<.0001). In the absence of rectal involvement, patients with multiple complications had a significantly higher rate of proctectomy than patients with single complications (23% vs. 10%, P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A wide spectrum of surgical techniques is required for the management of the diverse anorectal complications of Crohn's disease. Complete healing and control of sepsis can be achieved in the majority of patients. Active rectal disease and multiple complications significantly increase the need for proctectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11015093     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.108779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  28 in total

Review 1.  Managing Perianal Crohn’s Disease.

Authors:  Dawn M Wiese; David A Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Prognostic factors affecting outcomes in fistulating perianal Crohn's disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  G C Braithwaite; M J Lee; D Hind; S R Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Recovery rates and functional results after repair for rectovaginal fistula in Crohn's disease: a comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Sotirios Athanasiadis; Rayan Yazigi; Andreas Köhler; Christian Helmes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Management of nonhealing perineal wounds.

Authors:  Jill C Genua; David A Vivas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-11

Review 5.  Imaging techniques and combined medical and surgical treatment of perianal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  F Botti; A Losco; C Viganò; B Oreggia; M Prati; E Contessini Avesani
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-24

6.  Perianal Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Abhijit Basu; Steven D. Wexner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06

7.  Long-term success rate after surgical treatment of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Thilo Welsch; Stefanie Mühl; Ulf Hinz; Jan Schmidt; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Perianal abscess/fistula disease.

Authors:  Mark H Whiteford
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

9.  [Perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: treatment results at an interdisciplinary unit].

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; H Glass; A Kilger; C Ott; F Klebl; A Agha; H J Schlitt; U Strauch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Myocutaneous flaps and proctocolectomy in severe perianal Crohn's disease--a single stage procedure.

Authors:  Dagmar Schaden; Georg Schauer; Franz Haas; Anton Berger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.