Literature DB >> 11014485

Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease.

L E Green1, K Lewis, A Kimpton, C J Nicol.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study of risk factors for feather pecking in layings hens in alternative systems was carried out in July 1998. A total of 637 questionnaires were sent out to farmers and producer groups and, after two reminders, the final response rate was 51.5 per cent. The outcome variable was feather pecking after point of lay. Over 55 per cent of the farmers reported that feather pecking had occurred in the last depopulated flock. This outcome was compared with the management procedures reported by flock managers by using univariate statistics. Factors associated with feather pecking with a significance < or = 0.05 were then tested in two logistic regression models. In the first model the following factors were associated with an increased risk of feather pecking: less than 50 per cent of the flock using the outdoor area on a fine and sunny day, the occurrence of egg peritonitis and the occurrence of infectious bronchitis. The direction of the association between feather pecking and these infectious diseases was unclear, so in the second model only factors which were consistent throughout the laying period were tested. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of feather pecking: less than 50 per cent of the flock using the outdoor area on a fine and sunny day; three or more changes of diet during lay; the inspection of the flock by one person; an absence of loose litter at the end of lay; a temperature in the hen house of less than 20 degrees C; turning the lights up when the flock was inspected; and the use of bell-drinkers. It is concluded that some of these factors could inhibit foraging and dust-bathing behaviour and others may increase competition or frustration, both of these changes having been shown experimentally to initiate feather pecking behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014485     DOI: 10.1136/vr.147.9.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  22 in total

1.  Effects of nest boxes in natural mating colony cages on fear, stress, and feather damage for layer breeders1,2,3.

Authors:  Haipeng Shi; Qin Tong; Weichao Zheng; Jiang Tu; Baoming Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Health and Welfare in Dutch Organic Laying Hens.

Authors:  Monique Bestman; Jan-Paul Wagenaar
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Assessment of Plumage and Integument Condition in Dual-Purpose Breeds and Conventional Layers.

Authors:  Mona Franziska Giersberg; Birgit Spindler; Nicole Kemper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Housing and Management Practices on 33 Pullet Farms in Canada.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Caitlin Decina; Christine F Baes; Tina M Widowski; Olaf Berke; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Individual Consistency of Feather Pecking Behavior in Laying Hens: Once a Feather Pecker Always a Feather Pecker?

Authors:  Courtney L Daigle; T Bas Rodenburg; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Janice C Swanson; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-04-14

7.  Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies.

Authors:  Claire A Weeks; Sarah L Lambton; Adrian G Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ranging Behaviour of Commercial Free-Range Laying Hens.

Authors:  Leonard Ikenna Chielo; Tom Pike; Jonathan Cooper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  A Description of Laying Hen Husbandry and Management Practices in Canada.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Caitlin Decina; Christine F Baes; Tina M Widowski; Olaf Berke; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  A survey of free-range egg farmers in the United Kingdom: Knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding antimicrobial use and resistance.

Authors:  Ann Catherine Rayner; Laura Elizabeth Higham; Roger Gill; Jean-Paul Michalski; Amanda Deakin
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.