Literature DB >> 11014412

A comparative pharmacodynamic study of IY-81149 versus omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

A P Periclou1, R Goldwater, S M Lee, D W Park, D Y Kim, K D Cho, F Boileau, W T Jung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the pharmacodynamic effects of IY-81149 and omeprazole on gastric pH in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
METHODS: Sixty male and female volunteers with gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled in a double-blind, two-way, crossover, dose-ranging study. Subjects were randomized into three groups, with each group comparing the effect of one of three doses of IY-81149 (5, 10, or 20 mg) with 20 mg omeprazole. IY-81149 and omeprazole were administered once daily for 5 days. Continuous 24-hour pH measurements were performed before the first dose (baseline) and after the fifth dose in both periods. Gastric acid suppression was evaluated on the basis of the following parameters: AUC(0-24), median pH in a 24-hour interval (pHmedian), and the percent time in a 24-hour interval in which the gastric pH was greater than 4 (tpH > 4). The truncated AUC parameters AUC(0-8), AUC(8-16), and AUC(16-24) were also calculated. The effects of IY-81149 and omeprazole on gastric pH were compared by use of analyses of covariance. The dose-response relationship for IY-81149 was also evaluated.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between 5 mg IY-81149 and 20 mg omeprazole in terms of AUC(0-24), pHmedian, tpH, 4, AUC(0-8), and AUC(8-16). IY-81149, at 10 mg, produced a significantly greater gastric acid suppression than omeprazole on the basis of the values of AUC(0-24), pHmedian, tpH > 4, AUC(8-16), and AUC(16-24). Administration of 20 mg IY-81149 produced a significantly greater gastric acid suppression on the basis of all parameters. All doses of IY-81149 were more effective than omeprazole during 16 to 24 hours after the dose was administered.
CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 10 and 20 mg IY-81149 produced a statistically significantly greater and prolonged suppression of gastric pH than 20 mg omeprazole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014412     DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2000.109155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Feng Shao; Xuemei Liu; Wen Xu; Ning Ou; Xianghong Qin; Fang Liu; Xuemei Hou; Haitang Hu; Ji Jiang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Intravenous ilaprazole is more potent than oral ilaprazole against gastric lesions in rats.

Authors:  Gang Yu; Xin-Qiang Lu; Rui-Bin Su; Ze-Hui Gong; He-Zhi Xie; Hai-Tang Hu; Xue-Mei Hou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Efficacy of ilaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Qing Ji; Jun-Feng Du; Gang Chen; Guang Chen; Bo Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Insights into the future of gastric acid suppression.

Authors:  Kenneth R DeVault; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  An improved LC-MS/MS method for quantitative determination of ilaprazole and its metabolites in human plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Gan Zhou; Zhi-rong Tan; Wei Zhang; Dong-sheng Ou-Yang; Yao Chen; Dong Guo; Ying-zi Liu; Lan Fan; Han-wu Deng
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Multiple-Infusion Ilaprazole in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Liwei Lang; Ning Ou; Ruihua Shi; Haitang Hu; Pei Hu; Ji Jiang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Randomized, parallel, double-blind comparison of the ulcer-healing effects of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Khek Yu Ho; Arlene Kuan; Felix Zaño; Khean Lee Goh; Varocha Mahachai; Dong Yeon Kim; Hwan Min Yoon
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Pharmacokinetic drug interaction and safety after coadministration of clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and ilaprazole: a randomised, open-label, one-way crossover, two parallel sequences study.

Authors:  Byung Hak Jin; Byung Won Yoo; Jungsin Park; Jung Hye Kim; Jun Yeon Lee; Jae Soo Shin; Min Soo Park
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Esophageal Acidification During Nocturnal Acid-breakthrough with Ilaprazole Versus Omeprazole in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Arun Karyampudi; Uday C Ghoshal; Rajan Singh; Abhai Verma; Asha Misra; Vivek A Saraswat
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

10.  Prospective Single Arm Study on the Effect of Ilaprazole in Patients with Heartburn but No Reflux Esophagitis.

Authors:  In Ji Song; Hyun Ki Kim; Na Keum Lee; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.