Literature DB >> 11014253

Texture analysis of breast tumors on sonograms.

D R Chen1, R F Chang, Y L Huang, Y H Chou, C M Tiu, P P Tsai.   

Abstract

We performed a feasibility study to determine if the texture features extracted from sonograms can be used to predict malignant or benign breast pathology by the proposed artificial neural network and to compare the diagnostic results with the radiologists' results. A total of 1,020 images (4 different rectangular regions from the 2 orthogonal imaging planes of each tumor) from 255 patients were used as samples. When a sonogram was performed, 1 physician identified the region of interest in the sonogram; then, a neural network model, using 24 autocorrelation texture features, classified the tumor as benign or malignant. Three radiologists who were unfamiliar with the samples also classified these images. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area index for the proposed neural network system is 0.9840 +/- 0.0072. The neural network identified 35 of 36 malignancies and 211 of 219 benign tumors using all 4 regions of interest. The radiologists, on average, identified 19 of 36 malignancies, with 12 tumors called indeterminate and 4 tumors called benign. We conclude that benign and malignant breast tumors can be distinguished using interpixel correlation in digital ultrasonic images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014253     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(00)90025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  11 in total

1.  Classification of benign and malignant breast masses based on shape and texture features in sonography images.

Authors:  Fahimeh Sadat Zakeri; Hamid Behnam; Nasrin Ahmadinejad
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Level set contouring for breast tumor in sonography.

Authors:  Yu-Len Huang; Yu-Ru Jiang; Dar-Ren Chen; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  Breast mass classification on sonographic images on the basis of shape analysis.

Authors:  Hamid Behnam; Fahimeh Sadat Zakeri; Nasrin Ahmadinejad
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Characterizing breast masses using an integrative framework of machine learning and CEUS-based radiomics.

Authors:  Bino A Varghese; Sandy Lee; Steven Cen; Amir Talebi; Passant Mohd; Daniel Stahl; Melissa Perkins; Bhushan Desai; Vinay A Duddalwar; Linda H Larsen
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-01-17

Review 6.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lingyun Cai; Xin Wang; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Guo; Jinhua Yu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 8.  Artificial Neural Networks in Image Processing for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  M M Mehdy; P Y Ng; E F Shair; N I Md Saleh; C Gomes
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey.

Authors:  Abdullah-Al Nahid; Yinan Kong
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Comparative analysis of logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast tumors by the use of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging.

Authors:  Shou-Tung Chen; Yi-Hsuan Hsiao; Yu-Len Huang; Shou-Jen Kuo; Hsin-Shun Tseng; Hwa-Koon Wu; Dar-Ren Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.