| Literature DB >> 11014050 |
I R Newby-Clark1, M Ross, R Buehler, D J Koehler, D Griffin.
Abstract
Task completion plans normally resemble best-case scenarios and yield overly optimistic predictions of completion times. The authors induced participants to generate more pessimistic scenarios and examined completion predictions. Participants described a pessimistic scenario of task completion either alone or with an optimistic scenario. Pessimistic scenarios did not affect predictions or accuracy and were consistently rated less plausible than optimistic scenarios (Experiments 1-3). Experiment 4 independently manipulated scenario plausibility and optimism. Plausibility moderated the impact of optimistic, but not pessimistic, scenarios. Experiment 5 supported a motivational explanation of the tendency to disregard pessimistic scenarios regardless of their plausibility. People took pessimistic scenarios into account when predicting someone else's completion times. The authors conclude that pessimistic-scenario generation may not be an effective debiasing technique for personal predictions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 11014050 DOI: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.3.171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl ISSN: 1076-898X