PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of multislice CT in the diagnosis of the paranasal sinuses. METHODS: Dose measurements were performed exposing an Alderson Rando phantom in a four-slice spiral CT (MS-CT) while applying a variety of scan parameters. Additionally, 30 consecutive patients underwent a transversal examination by the MS-CT using 1/1/3.5/0.5 mm spiral parameters and an additional transversal or coronal scan on a conventional single slice spiral CT (SS-CT) with 2/3/1 mm. Coronal reformations of the MS-CT were compared with the primary coronal SS-CT, or coronal reformations of the transversal SS-CT, respectively, with regard to image quality and depiction of relevant anatomical details of the region. RESULTS: Superficial exposure values at the level of the eye lenses as well as for the thyroid gland were superior for MS-CT (3.62 mGy, and 0.12 mGy, resp.) as compared to SS-CT (2.96 mGy, and 0.07 mGy). Image quality was equal or superior for MS-CT as compared to SS-CT in all but one case. Drawbacks of SS-CT, such as dental amalgam artifacts, stair step artifacts or partial volume artifacts did not notably affect the coronal reformations of MS-CT. CONCLUSION: MS-CT seems to have the potential to replace primary coronal CT of the paranasal sinuses without any loss of image quality, but may even improve the overall diagnostic value. Radiation doses may still have to be reduced.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of multislice CT in the diagnosis of the paranasal sinuses. METHODS: Dose measurements were performed exposing an Alderson Rando phantom in a four-slice spiral CT (MS-CT) while applying a variety of scan parameters. Additionally, 30 consecutive patients underwent a transversal examination by the MS-CT using 1/1/3.5/0.5 mm spiral parameters and an additional transversal or coronal scan on a conventional single slice spiral CT (SS-CT) with 2/3/1 mm. Coronal reformations of the MS-CT were compared with the primary coronal SS-CT, or coronal reformations of the transversal SS-CT, respectively, with regard to image quality and depiction of relevant anatomical details of the region. RESULTS: Superficial exposure values at the level of the eye lenses as well as for the thyroid gland were superior for MS-CT (3.62 mGy, and 0.12 mGy, resp.) as compared to SS-CT (2.96 mGy, and 0.07 mGy). Image quality was equal or superior for MS-CT as compared to SS-CT in all but one case. Drawbacks of SS-CT, such as dental amalgam artifacts, stair step artifacts or partial volume artifacts did not notably affect the coronal reformations of MS-CT. CONCLUSION: MS-CT seems to have the potential to replace primary coronal CT of the paranasal sinuses without any loss of image quality, but may even improve the overall diagnostic value. Radiation doses may still have to be reduced.