Literature DB >> 11013499

One-year prevalence of low back pain in two Swiss regions: estimates from the population participating in the 1992-1993 MONICA project.

B Santos-Eggimann1, V Wietlisbach, M Rickenbach, F Paccaud, F Gutzwiller.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was performed.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent of low back pain as a public health problem. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Health surveys converge on very high estimates of low back pain in general populations, but few studies have included severity criteria in their definition and conclusions. Because it is unlikely that interventions will influence the prevalence of minimal and infrequent symptoms, greater attention should be paid to characteristics of low back pain that indicate some impact on the life of survey respondents.
METHODS: Two regions participated in the MONICA (MONitoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease) project in Switzerland. Participants randomly selected from the general population completed a standard self-administered questionnaire on cardiovascular risk factors. A special section on low back pain was added in the third (1992-1993) MONICA survey and completed by 3227 participants.
RESULTS: A regional difference found in the 12-month prevalence rate disappeared with the inclusion of severity criteria. Low back pain over more than seven cumulated days was reported among men by 20.2% (age range, 25-34 years) to 28.5% (age range, 65-74 years), respectively, among women by 31.1% to 38.5%. Similar rates of reduction in activity (professional, housekeeping, and leisure time) and medical consultation (conventional and nonconventional) motivated by low back pain characterized the two participating regions. The cumulative duration of pain was related to all the indicators showing the impact of low back pain on everyday life.
CONCLUSIONS: Determining the cumulative duration of low back pain over the preceding year is a straightforward task, and a cutoff at 1 week seems appropriate for distinguishing between low- and high-impact low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013499     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The role of physical workload and pain related fear in the development of low back pain in young workers: evidence from the BelCoBack Study; results after one year of follow up.

Authors:  A Van Nieuwenhuyse; P R Somville; G Crombez; A Burdorf; G Verbeke; K Johannik; O Van den Bergh; R Masschelein; Ph Mairiaux; G F Moens
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Self-management of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephen May
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Previous Mental Disorders and Subsequent Onset of Chronic Back or Neck Pain: Findings From 19 Countries.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Viana; Carmen C W Lim; Flavia Garcia Pereira; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Ronny Bruffaerts; Peter de Jonge; Jose Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Siobhan O'Neill; Dan J Stein; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Corina Benjet; Graça Cardoso; Silvia Florescu; Giovanni de Girolamo; Josep Maria Haro; Chiyi Hu; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Daphna Levinson; Marina Piazza; José Posada-Villa; Daniel Rabczenko; Ronald C Kessler; Kate M Scott
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Comparison of spinal manipulation methods and usual medical care for acute and subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Schneider; Mitchell Haas; Ronald Glick; Joel Stevans; Doug Landsittel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Workplace stress, lifestyle and social factors as correlates of back pain: a representative study of the German working population.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Holger Schmitt; Silke Zoller; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Back and neck pain and psychopathology in rural sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from the Gilgel Gibe Growth and Development Study, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Craig Hadley; Fasil Tessema; Ayalew Tegegn; John A Cowan; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Increased low back pain prevalence in females than in males after menopause age: evidences based on synthetic literature review.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jùn-Qīng Wáng; Zoltán Káplár
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

10.  What is the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in the elderly population in developed countries? A systematic critical literature review.

Authors:  René Fejer; Alexander Ruhe
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.