Literature DB >> 11013015

An economic assessment of Apligraf (Graftskin) for the treatment of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers.

W H Schonfeld1, K F Villa, J M Fastenau, P D Mazonson, V Falanga.   

Abstract

Several recent advances in wound care may offer promise for the treatment of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. One such treatment is Apligraf (Graftskin), a bilayered, living human skin construct. To assess the economic impact of Graftskin, a model was constructed to compare the annual medical costs and cost-effectiveness of treating hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers with Graftskin vs. compression therapy using Unna's boot. A semi-Markov model was used to describe the pattern of ulcer treatment, healing, and recurrence among patients with venous leg ulcers. Patients received 1 of 2 treatment regimens, Graftskin or Unna's boot, and were followed in the model for a 12-month period. The analysis was done from the perspective of a commercial health plan; therefore, only direct medical costs were included. Health care resource use included the primary therapeutic intervention, additional compression dressings, physician office visits, home health visits, laboratory tests and procedures, management of adverse events, and hospitalizations. The model estimated the annual medical cost of managing patients with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers to be $20,041 for those treated with Graftskin and $27,493 for those treated with Unna's boot. In addition, treatment with Graftskin led to approximately 3 more months in the healed state per person per year than did treatment with Unna's boot. Because patients treated with Graftskin experienced improved healing compared with those treated with compression therapy using Unna's boot, they required fewer months of treatment for unhealed ulcers. As a result, the use of Graftskin for treating hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers resulted in lower overall treatment costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11013015     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  12 in total

Review 1.  Skin substitutes: an overview of the key players in wound management.

Authors:  Rajiv Nathoo; Nicole Howe; George Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Clinical applications of naturally derived biopolymer-based scaffolds for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Whitney L Stoppel; Chiara E Ghezzi; Stephanie L McNamara; Lauren D Black; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Astrid Langer; Wolf Rogowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  June E Jones; E Andrea Nelson; Aws Al-Hity
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-01-31

5.  Wound healing of cutaneous sulfur mustard injuries: strategies for the development of improved therapies.

Authors:  John S Graham; Robert P Chilcott; Paul Rice; Stephen M Milner; Charles G Hurst; Beverly I Maliner
Journal:  J Burns Wounds       Date:  2005-01-05

Review 6.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of complex wound interventions reveals optimal treatments for specific wound types.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Elise Cogo; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Paul A Khan; Geetha Sanmugalingham; Jesmin Antony; Jeffrey S Hoch; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  The Use of Fetal Bovine Dermal Scaffold (PriMatrix) in the Management of Full-Thickness Hand Burns.

Authors:  Alexis Lanteri Parcells; Jenika Karcich; Mark S Granick; Michael A Marano
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-09-24

8.  Skin Substitutes for Adults With Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 9.  A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Larissa Zaulyanov; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous and venous etiology: a cost-effectiveness analysis of extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Marco Romanelli; Adrienne M Gilligan; Curtis R Waycaster; Valentina Dini
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.