PURPOSE: To describe the normal anatomy of the finger flexor tendon pulley system, with anatomic correlation, and to define criteria to diagnose pulley abnormalities with different imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of cadaveric fingers underwent computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and ultrasonography (US). The normal anatomy of the pulley system was studied at extension and flexion without and with MR tenography. Pulley lengths were measured, and anatomic correlation was performed. Pulley lesions were created and studied at flexion, extension, and forced flexion. Two radiologists reviewed the studies in blinded fashion. RESULTS: MR imaging demonstrated A2 (proximal phalanx) and A4 (middle phalanx) pulleys in 12 (100%) of 12 cases, without and with tenography. MR tenography showed the A3 (proximal interphalangeal) and A5 (distal interphalangeal) pulleys in 10 (83%) and nine (75%) cases, respectively. US showed the A2 pulley in all cases and the A4 pulley in eight (67%). CT did not allow direct pulley visualization. No significant differences in pulley lengths were measured at MR, US, or pathologic examination (P: =.512). Direct lesion diagnosis was possible with MR imaging and US in 79%-100% of cases, depending on lesion type. Indirect diagnosis was successful with all methods with forced flexion. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and US provide means of direct finger pulley system evaluation.
PURPOSE: To describe the normal anatomy of the finger flexor tendon pulley system, with anatomic correlation, and to define criteria to diagnose pulley abnormalities with different imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of cadaveric fingers underwent computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and ultrasonography (US). The normal anatomy of the pulley system was studied at extension and flexion without and with MR tenography. Pulley lengths were measured, and anatomic correlation was performed. Pulley lesions were created and studied at flexion, extension, and forced flexion. Two radiologists reviewed the studies in blinded fashion. RESULTS: MR imaging demonstrated A2 (proximal phalanx) and A4 (middle phalanx) pulleys in 12 (100%) of 12 cases, without and with tenography. MR tenography showed the A3 (proximal interphalangeal) and A5 (distal interphalangeal) pulleys in 10 (83%) and nine (75%) cases, respectively. US showed the A2 pulley in all cases and the A4 pulley in eight (67%). CT did not allow direct pulley visualization. No significant differences in pulley lengths were measured at MR, US, or pathologic examination (P: =.512). Direct lesion diagnosis was possible with MR imaging and US in 79%-100% of cases, depending on lesion type. Indirect diagnosis was successful with all methods with forced flexion. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and US provide means of direct finger pulley system evaluation.
Authors: Michel De Maeseneer; Tjeerd Jager; Kurt Vanderdood; Peter Van Roy; Maryam Shahabpour; Stefaan Marcelis Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Srinivasan Harish; Edgar Jan; Karen Finlay; Brad Petrisor; Terry Popowich; Lawrence Friedman; Bruce Wainman; Erik Jurriaans Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Vasco Goncalves-Matoso; Daniel Guntern; Anne Gray; Pierre Schnyder; Carmen Picht; Nicolas Theumann Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2007-12-19 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: C K Spies; J Heuvens; M F Langer; P Eysel; L P Müller; D Grevenstein; J Oppermann Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 3.067