Literature DB >> 11012049

Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

G J Kaptain1, N E Simmons, R E Replogle, L Pobereskin.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors undertook a study to explore the predisposing risk factors, frequency of occurrence, and clinical implications of kyphosis following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
METHODS: Preoperative radiological studies were available in 46 patients with CSM who had undergone laminectomy. Records were reviewed to obtain demographic data and operative reports. Preoperative radiographs were assessed to determine spinal alignment. In a follow-up interview the authors established clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Postoperative cervical alignment and mobility was also determined by assessing lateral neutral, flexion, and extension x-ray films. Preoperatively, the cervical spine was shown to be kyphotic in four (9%) of 46, straight in 20 (43%) of 46, and lordotic in 22 (48%) of 46 patients. Nine (21%) of 42 patients with either straight or lordotic alignment demonstrated in the preoperative period developed kyphosis after surgery. Kyphosis developed in six (30%) of 20 patients in whom straight spinal alignment was demonstrated preoperatively and in only three (14%) of 22 patients in whom lordosis was found preoperatively. Clinically, 13 (29%) of 45 patients improved and 19 (42%) of 45 remained unchanged after an average 4-year follow-up period; 36 (80%) patients believed that their surgery was successful (one patient, who was mentally retarded, could not respond to the follow-up questionnaire). Spinal alignment was not predictive of outcome; cervical mobility as demonstrated on flexion and extension, however, correlated with improved functional performance (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Kyphosis may develop in up to 21% of patients who have undergone laminectomy for CSM. Progression of the deformity appears to be more than twice as likely if preoperative radiological studies demonstrate a straight spine. In this study, clinical outcome did not correlate with either pre- or postoperative sagittal alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11012049     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  66 in total

1.  Long-term stability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spinal cord tumor resection in von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Ashok R Asthagiri; Gautam U Mehta; John A Butman; Martin Baggenstos; Edward H Oldfield; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-28

2.  Restoration of Cervical Alignment is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcome after One and Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Jack E Zigler; Richard D Guyer; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-12

3.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical comparison of laminectomy, hemilaminectomy and a new minimally invasive approach in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical intradural tumour: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tianhao Xie; Jun Qian; Yicheng Lu; Bo Chen; Yikun Jiang; Chun Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Spondylotic cervical myelopathy : Indication of surgical treatment].

Authors:  W Pepke; H Almansour; M Richter; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Rudolf Andreas Kristof; Thomas Kiefer; Marcus Thudium; Florian Ringel; Michael Stoffel; Attlila Kovacs; Christian-Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Anterior migration of spinal cord after cervical corpectomy.

Authors:  Yu Qian; Guojian Xu; Jun Zhang; Xiaofeng Zhao; Dong Wen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.