Literature DB >> 11011333

Abciximab provides cost-effective survival advantage in high-volume interventional practice.

D J Kereiakes1, R L Obenchain, B L Barber, A Smith, M McDonald, T M Broderick, J P Runyon, T M Shimshak, J F Schneider, C R Hattemer, E M Roth, D D Whang, D Cocks, C W Abbottsmith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled randomized trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention have demonstrated efficacy of these agents for reducing the risk of periprocedural ischemic events. However, cost-effectiveness of this adjunctive pharmacotherapy has been scrutinized. Extrapolation of cost-efficacy observations from clinical trials to "real world" interventional practice is problematic.
METHODS: Consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 1472) performed by Ohio Heart Health Center operators at The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1997 were analyzed for procedural and long-term (6-month) outcomes and charges. Observations on cost and efficacy (survival) were adjusted for nonrandomized abciximab allocation by means of "propensity scoring" methods.
RESULTS: Abciximab therapy was associated with a survival advantage to 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The average reduction in mortality rate at 6 months was 3.4% (unadjusted) and 4.9% when adjusted for nonrandomization. The average charge increment to 6 months was $1512 (unadjusted) and $950 when adjusted for nonrandomization. Patients deriving the greatest reduction in mortality rates also had a reduction in total cardiovascular charges to 6 months. Distinguishing demographics of this population included multivessel coronary intervention, coronary stent deployment, intervention within 1 week of myocardial infarction, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. The average cost per life-year gained in this study was $2875 for all patients (unadjusted) and $1243 when adjusted for nonrandomization.
CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab provides a cost-effective survival advantage in high-volume interventional practice that compares favorably with currently accepted standards. Clinical and procedural demographics associated with increased cost-effectiveness included multivessel coronary intervention, stent deployment, recent (<1 week) myocardial infarction, and impaired left ventricular function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11011333     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.109647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  Choice of GPIIb/IIIa antagonist in percutaneous coronary intervention: how should economic criteria be factored in?

Authors:  Claude Le Pen; Hervé Lilliu
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-04

2.  LocalControl: An R Package for Comparative Safety and Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Nicolas R Lauve; Stuart J Nelson; S Stanley Young; Robert L Obenchain; Christophe G Lambert
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 6.440

3.  Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Changyu Shen; Xiaochun Li; Lingling Li; Martin C Were
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Effects of changing clinical practice on costs and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention between 1998 and 2002.

Authors:  M A Denvir; A J Lee; J Rysdale; R J Prescott; H Eteiba; I R Starkey; J P Pell; A Walker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Abciximab: an updated review of its therapeutic use in patients with ischaemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation.

Authors:  Tim Ibbotson; Jane K McGavin; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.