Literature DB >> 11010767

Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Part 2: results of treatment of 348 patients.

P Marker1, A Nielsen, H L Bastian.   

Abstract

This study was designed to record the results of conservative treatment of condylar fractures and to find out if there were any variables that were predictive of complications. Data were analysed in our computer department. During the period 1984-1996, all patients who presented with a fracture of the mandibular condyle and who attended for control examination one year after treatment were recorded at the end of treatment and one year later. The ability to open the mouth, deviation and occlusion were recorded. After one year 45 of the 348 patients (13%) had minor physical complaints such as reduced ability to open the mouth, deviation, or dysfunction. Ten of them (3%) had pain in the joint or muscles or both. Eight patients (2%) had malocclusion, which in seven could be related to dislocation of the condylar head out of the fossa. Five of the eight patients had had bilateral fractures. We conclude that conservative treatment of condylar fractures is non-traumatic, safe, and reliable and in only a few cases may cause disturbances of function and malocclusion. The risk associated with the latter is greatest with bilateral fractures and dislocation of the condylar head from the fossa. Copyright 2000 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11010767     DOI: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  10 in total

1.  Mandibular war injuries caused by bullets and shell fragments: a comparative study.

Authors:  Auday M Al-Anee; Ahmed Fadhel Al-Quisi; Hassanien A Al-Jumaily
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-07

2.  A comparative evaluation of rhytidectomy versus retromandibular approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of mandibular condylar fractures.

Authors:  D Saikrishna; Sujith Kumar Shetty; V P Reshma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-06-10

Review 3.  Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Brent B Pickrell; Arman T Serebrakian; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Influence of the impacted mandibular third molars on fractures of the mandibular angle and condyle - A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Arunesh Tiwari; Jeevan Lata; Madan Mishra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 5.  Long-term Complications of Isolated and Combined Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Margaux Nys; Tim Van Cleemput; Jakob Titiaan Dormaar; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-23

6.  Let Bilateral Condylar Fracture Fixation Be the Norm and Not a Choice.

Authors:  Rohit Punga; Shivangi Gaur
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  A 4-Year Multicentre Audit of Complications Following ORIF Treatment of Mandibular Fractures.

Authors:  Sathesh Balasundram; Ferdinand J Kovilpillai; Stephen J Royan; Bee Chai Ma; Dharmindra Rajah Gunarajah; Tassha Hilda Adnan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-25

8.  The maxillofacial injuries: A study.

Authors:  Vibha Singh; Laxman Malkunje; Shadab Mohammad; Nimisha Singh; Satish Dhasmana; Sanjib Kumar Das
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

9.  Analysis between Retromandibular and Periangular Transmasseteric Approach for Fixation of Condylar Fracture - A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Saloni Gupta; Vishal Bansal; Apoorva Mowar; Jayendra Purohit; Mohit Bindal
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 10.  The treatment of condylar fractures: to open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy.

Authors:  Renato Valiati; Danilo Ibrahim; Marcelo Emir Requia Abreu; Claiton Heitz; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Daniela Nascimento Silva
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.