Literature DB >> 11008871

Contributing factors influencing the functional outcome of floating knee injuries.

K Yokoyama1, T Nakamura, M Shindo, T Tsukamoto, Y Saita, S Aoki, M Itoman.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively review the floating knee injuries treated at our institute and to determine various factors, such as severity of soft-tissue or skeletal injuries, site of fractures, and treatment methods that may significantly influence the final functional result in these injuries. Between 1986 and 1996, 65 patients with 66 floating knee injuries were treated in our institution. Among 66 fractures of the femur, 19 (29%) were open. There were 43 open tibial fractures. Fifty cases were Fraser type I floating knee fractures, 7 were type IIa, 2 were type IIb, and 7 were type IIc. In 63 cases (95%), both bones had been surgically stabilized with interlocked nails, Ender pins, plates, screws with/without pinning, or external fixations. Final functional results were evaluated according to Karlström and Olerud's criteria. Satisfactory results were rated as cases with excellent or good results. The mean follow-up time was 16.6 months range, (12-50 months). We assessed various factors influencing functional results, including Fraser type, severity of open injury grade (Gustilo) in both fractures, combination of open/closed injuries, fracture types (AO/ASIF type), existence of multiple trauma, neurovascular injuries, polyskeletal trauma, and stabilizing method or operation timing of both fractures. Satisfactory rates in Fraser type I and type II were 64% and 25%, respectively (P= .02). The satisfactory rate in closed, grade I+II, and grade III injuries of the femoral fractures was 53.2%, 81.8%, and 25%, respectively (grade I+II vs. grade III: P < .03). There were no significant correlations between the functional result and the following factors: soft-tissue injuries of the tibia; the fracture pattern of both fractures; the combination of open/closed injuries in each fracture; injury severity score; the existence of neurovascular injuries and double femoral fractures; treatment methods; and operation timing. Severity of damage to the knee joint and open injuries in the thigh were found to be significant factors contributing to the functional outcome in floating knee injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  5 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of type II floating knee: comparisons of the results of type IIA and type IIB floating knee.

Authors:  Shao-Hung Hung; Yen-Mou Lu; Hsuan-Ti Huang; Yen-Ko Lin; Je-Ken Chang; Jian-Chih Chen; Yin-Chun Tien; Peng-Ju Huang; Chung-Hwan Chen; Ping-Cheng Liu; David Chao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Traumatic Floating Knee: A Review of a Multi-Centric Series of 172 Cases in Adult.

Authors:  J-M Feron; P Bonnevialle; G Pietu; F Jacquot1
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-07-31

3.  The intramedullary nailing using a single knee incision for treatment of extraarticular floating knee (nine cases).

Authors:  Omar Dahmani; Amine Elrhazi; Mohamed Elidrissi; Mohamed Shimi; Abdelhalim Elibrahimi; Abdelmajid Elmrini
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures.

Authors:  Josep Muñoz Vives; Jean-Christophe Bel; Arantxa Capel Agundez; Francisco Chana Rodríguez; José Palomo Traver; Morten Schultz-Larsen; Theodoros Tosounidis
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Functional outcomes and quality of life in adult ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures.

Authors:  Abdullah Demirtas; Ibrahim Azboy; Celil Alemdar; Mehmet Gem; Emin Ozkul; Mehmet Bulut; Kadir Uzel
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.