Literature DB >> 11008821

Effects of frequency and level on auditory stream segregation.

M M Rose1, B C Moore.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of center frequency and level on the perceptual grouping of rapid tone sequences. The sequence ABA-ABA-...was used, where A and B represent sinusoidal tone bursts (10-ms rise/fall, 80-ms steady state, 20-ms interval between tones) and - represents a silent interval of 120 ms. In experiment 1, tone A was fixed in frequency at 62, 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, or 8000 Hz. Both tones had a level of approximately 40 dB SL. Tone B started with a frequency well above that of tone A, and its frequency was swept toward that of tone A so that the frequency separation between them decreased in an exponential manner. Subjects were required to indicate when they could no longer hear the tones A and B as two separate streams, but heard only a single stream with a "gallop" rhythm. This changeover point between percepts is called the fission boundary. The separation between tones A and B at the fission boundary was roughly independent of the frequency of tone A when expressed as the difference in number of equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) between A and B, but varied more with frequency when the difference was expressed in barks or cents. In experiment 2, the center frequency was fixed at 250, 1000, or 4000 Hz, and the level of the A and B tones was 40, 55, 70, or 85 dB SPL. The frequency separation of the A and B tones at the fission boundary tended to increase slightly with increasing level, in a manner consistent with the broadening of the auditory filter with increasing level. The results support the "peripheral channeling" explanation of stream segregation advanced by Hartmann and Johnson [Music Percept. 9, 155-184 (1991)], and indicate that the perception of fusion or fission in alternating-tone sequences depends partly upon the degree of overlap of the excitation patterns evoked by the successive sounds in the cochlea, as assumed in the theory of Beauvois and Meddis [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2270-2280 (1996)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008821     DOI: 10.1121/1.1287708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Animal models for auditory streaming.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The effects of time, space and spectrum on auditory grouping in túngara frogs.

Authors:  H E Farris; A Stanley Rand; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Perceptual organization and stability of auditory streaming for pure tones and /ba/ stimuli.

Authors:  Samantha J Gustafson; John Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Renee M Symonds; Juin W Zhou; Sally L Cole; Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Coral Hanson; Laurent Demany; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; James Dewey; Lesli A Guthrie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 10.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.