Literature DB >> 11008137

Salience from feature contrast: variations with texture density.

H C Nothdurft1.   

Abstract

The salience of popout targets was measured in regular line arrays as a function of texture density. Test targets (singletons with orientation, motion, or luminance contrast) presented at different raster widths were compared with reference lines (lines brighter than surrounding lines) presented at fixed raster width. The luminance at which the reference target appeared as salient as the particular test target was taken as a measure of the relative salience of the test target. For orientation or motion contrast, targets at medium to small raster widths were far more salient than targets in sparse or very dense line arrangements. For targets defined by luminance contrast, salience variations with texture density were less pronounced. Some subjects also reported salience for lines in sparse arrangements even when these did not display feature contrast. When such non-specific saliency effects were subtracted from the actual measurements, salience curves for orientation or motion contrast revealed peaks of increased sensitivity at line spacings below 2-3 deg and flat curves at larger grid sizes. In an additional experiment, saliency effects from orientation contrast were measured using texture lines of different size. Salience variations were commonly observed. However, the curves were not found to scale with the different sizes of texture elements but were constantly related to the free space between neighbouring lines. This suggests that peaks in the salience profiles reflect the limited spatial extent of the underlying neural mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008137     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00168-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  The time course of intended and unintended allocation of attention.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-08-31

2.  The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular systems in the redundant target effect.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Veronica Mazza; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual saliency: a biologically plausible contourlet-like frequency domain approach.

Authors:  Peng Bian; Liming Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Sensory versus motor loci for integration of multiple motion signals in smooth pursuit eye movements and human motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Qiong Niu; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Orientation saliency without visual cortex and target selection in archer fish.

Authors:  Alik Mokeichev; Ronen Segev; Ohad Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fur in the midst of the waters: visual search for material type is inefficient.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Loretta Myers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Red to green or fast to slow? Infants' visual working memory for "just salient differences".

Authors:  Zsuzsa Kaldy; Erik Blaser
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-03-22

8.  A computational model to link psychophysics and cortical cell activation patterns in human texture processing.

Authors:  A Thielscher; H Neumann
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.453

9.  Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Michael Zehetleitner; Klaus Gramann; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.