Literature DB >> 11007838

Workload generated by a living donor programme for renal transplantation.

R N Saunders1, R Elwell, G J Murphy, T Horsburgh, S J Carr, M L Nicholson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ethical and medical implications of live kidney donation result in a comprehensive work-up process. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of the workload and the yield of renal transplants generated by a live donor programme.
METHODS: Referrals to the Leicester live donor programme over the five-year period 1994-1998 were retrospectively assessed. These were initiated by nephrology referral and subsequently investigated in a stepwise manner. Patients were counselled and baseline tests performed prior to consultant surgeon review and assessment of donor renal function/anatomy.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty referrals consisting of 150 recipients with 269 potential donors were originally made. This resulted in 32/120 (27%) related and 3/30 (10%) unrelated recipients (P=0.06) and 32/220 (15%) related and 3/49 (6%) unrelated donors proceeding to live donor transplantation, with a mean work-up time (+/-SD) of 9 (+/-7) months. One hundred and fifteen recipients (77%) and 234 (87%) donors failed to proceed at various stages of assessment, for a variety of immunological, medical and social reasons. A large number of expensive immunological investigations were required for potential donors, the majority of which did not proceed to transplantation. However as a result of performing these in the early stages of assessment the number of more invasive tests is kept to a minimum.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a relatively low yield of transplants from live donor referrals, particularly those between unrelated individuals. The vast majority of referrals fail to proceed for legitimate reasons, but as a result, create a significant workload with notable staffing and financial implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11007838     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/15.10.1667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  3 in total

1.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Deonna R Moore; David Serur; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; James R Rodrigue; Rebecca Hays; Matthew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Justin Woo; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Matthew Cooper; Marian Reich; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-20

3.  Outcomes of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations in the Living Donor Collective Pilot Registry.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Yoon Son Ahn; Michael Conboy; Mary Amanda Dew; Christian Folken; Macey Levan; Ajay K Israni; Krista L Lentine; Arthur J Matas; Kenneth A Newell; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Allan B Massie; Donald Musgrove; Jon J Snyder; Sandra J Taler; Jeffrey Wang; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.