Literature DB >> 11007519

Impact of attenuation correction on the accuracy of FDG-PET in patients with abdominal tumors: a free-response ROC analysis.

R Hustinx1, R J Dolin, F Bénard, A Bhatnagar, D Chakraborty, R J Smith, S Jang, A Alavi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality and lesion detectability with and without attenuation correction in patients with abdominal tumors, using a free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) methodology. Thirty-four patients with various abdominal tumors were evaluated (11 men, 23 women, median age 48 years). Whole-body emission scans were performed 68 min (35-102 min) after intravenous injection of 4.3 MBq/kg fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Images were reconstructed using the OS-EM algorithm and corrected for attenuation either using postinjection singles transmission (n=27) or by calculation and body outline (n=7). Total scan duration did not exceed 70 min. Studies were read independently by four observers unaware of any clinical data. The uncorrected (UC) images were systematically read before the attenuation-corrected (AC) images. All studies were given an image quality score ranging from 1 (unreadable) to 5 (excellent). Each focus of increased activity was then localized and given a probability of malignancy using a five-point scale. The average image quality score was similar for both UC and AC images. At the time of the positron emission tomography (PET) scans, 127 lesions (63 liver metastases, 9 retroperitoneal lesions, 50 peritoneal or bowel lesions, and 5 pancreatic carcinomas) were revealed by pathological or correlative studies. The areas under the FROC curves were consistently greater for AC images (range 0.8663-0.8867) than for UC images (range 0.7774 -0.8613). Overall, the difference between the AC images and the UC images was significant (P=0.019). In particular, correction for attenuation increased the sensitivity regardless of the location of the lesions. In conclusion, correction for attenuation significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET for abdominal staging of neoplasms, without impairing the image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11007519     DOI: 10.1007/s002590000287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  4 in total

1.  FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An evaluation of iterative reconstruction strategies based on mediastinal lesion detection using hybrid Ga-67 SPECT images.

Authors:  Nicholas F Pereira; Howard C Gifford; P Hendrik Pretorius; Mark Smyczynski; Robert Licho; Peter Schneider; Troy Farncombe; Michael A King
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Positron emission tomography: An overview.

Authors:  A K Shukla; Utham Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2006-01

Review 4.  Attenuation-corrected vs. nonattenuation-corrected 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Urvi Joshi; Pieter G H M Raijmakers; Ingrid I Riphagen; Gerrit J J Teule; Arthur van Lingen; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.488

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.