L Leong1, A S Menko, G B Grunwald. 1. Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze the dynamics of N- and B-cadherin cell adhesion molecule expression and cytoskeletal interaction during embryonic chick lens development. METHODS: Localization of N- and B-cadherin, F-actin, and connexin 56 were determined by immunohistochemistry of developing lenses or immunocytochemistry of differentiating primary lens cultures. Biochemical analysis of cytoskeletal linkage of N- or B-cadherin was assessed by differential detergent extraction, electrophoresis, and immunoblotting. RESULTS: The results indicate that although both cadherins are expressed throughout lens development, N-cadherin expression detected was similar in both lens epithelial and fiber cells, whereas B-cadherin was preferentially localized to the lens fiber cells. During differentiation, both cadherins become increasingly associated with the lens cytoskeleton, as indicated biochemically by a transition from largely Triton X-100-soluble to Triton X-100-insoluble pools and immunocytologically by cadherin localization to cell-cell borders and colocalization with the actin cytoskeleton. Although a significant fraction of N-cadherin remains Triton X-100-soluble as the lens cells differentiate, B-cadherin becomes resistant to extraction by both Triton X-100 as well as RIPA buffers. As detected immunocytochemically in lens cell cultures, the temporal localization of N-cadherin to cell-cell interfaces precedes that of B-cadherin. Furthermore, temporal localization of B-cadherin, as opposed to N-cadherin, to cell-cell borders more closely parallels that of connexin 56 in vitro as well as in vivo. CONCLUSIONS; These results suggest that while both N- and B-cadherin are expressed during lens cell differentiation, both their patterns of expression as well as their cytoskeletal association differ between epithelial and fiber cells.
PURPOSE: To analyze the dynamics of N- and B-cadherin cell adhesion molecule expression and cytoskeletal interaction during embryonic chick lens development. METHODS: Localization of N- and B-cadherin, F-actin, and connexin 56 were determined by immunohistochemistry of developing lenses or immunocytochemistry of differentiating primary lens cultures. Biochemical analysis of cytoskeletal linkage of N- or B-cadherin was assessed by differential detergent extraction, electrophoresis, and immunoblotting. RESULTS: The results indicate that although both cadherins are expressed throughout lens development, N-cadherin expression detected was similar in both lens epithelial and fiber cells, whereas B-cadherin was preferentially localized to the lens fiber cells. During differentiation, both cadherins become increasingly associated with the lens cytoskeleton, as indicated biochemically by a transition from largely Triton X-100-soluble to Triton X-100-insoluble pools and immunocytologically by cadherin localization to cell-cell borders and colocalization with the actin cytoskeleton. Although a significant fraction of N-cadherin remains Triton X-100-soluble as the lens cells differentiate, B-cadherin becomes resistant to extraction by both Triton X-100 as well as RIPA buffers. As detected immunocytochemically in lens cell cultures, the temporal localization of N-cadherin to cell-cell interfaces precedes that of B-cadherin. Furthermore, temporal localization of B-cadherin, as opposed to N-cadherin, to cell-cell borders more closely parallels that of connexin 56 in vitro as well as in vivo. CONCLUSIONS; These results suggest that while both N- and B-cadherin are expressed during lens cell differentiation, both their patterns of expression as well as their cytoskeletal association differ between epithelial and fiber cells.
Authors: Rupalatha Maddala; Nikolai P Skiba; Robert Lalane; Diane L Sherman; Peter J Brophy; Ponugoti V Rao Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Caitlin M Logan; Suren Rajakaruna; Caitlin Bowen; Glenn L Radice; Michael L Robinson; A Sue Menko Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 3.582