Literature DB >> 11006042

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

M Markman1, A Kennedy, K Webster, B Kulp, G Peterson, J Belinson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design.
RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment.
CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11006042     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Nanotechnology-based cancer therapeutics--promise and challenge--lessons learned through the NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer.

Authors:  Dorothy Farrell; Krzysztof Ptak; Nicholas J Panaro; Piotr Grodzinski
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Effect of topotecan infusion duration on hematologic toxicity in recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Larry E Puls; James E Hunter; Martin M Crane
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P Lihua; X Y Chen; T X Wu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

4.  Pharmacokinetically guided phase I trial of topotecan and etoposide phosphate in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  N C Levitt; D J Propper; S Madhusudan; J P Braybrooke; C Echeta; R Te Poele; S L Davies; E Flanagan; I D Hickson; S Joel; T S Ganesan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer-at first relapse.

Authors:  Kimio Ushijima
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 6.  Patient selection and targeted treatment in the management of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Leamon; Chandra D Lovejoy; Binh Nguyen
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2013-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.