Literature DB >> 11005903

Fracture resistance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns.

P Rammelsberg1, G Eickemeyer, K Erdelt, P Pospiech.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Improved mechanical properties of contemporary composites has resulted in the extended use of composites for the restoration of posterior teeth. Although the indication of polymers was extended to metal-free individual crowns, the influence of tooth preparation design and cementation methods on the stability of these artificial crowns remains unknown.
PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of axial tooth preparation design, occlusal dimension, and cementation technique on the fracture resistance of metal-free posterior Artglass crowns.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two extracted human third molars, assigned to experimental groups by size, received standardized tooth preparation. Axial tooth preparation included an invasive approach with 1-mm deep shoulder and a less invasive 0.5-mm chamfer preparation, whereas occlusal reduction was either 0.5 mm or 1.3 mm. Artglass crowns that restored the original tooth contour were cemented with 3 cements: zinc phosphate cement (ZnP), glass ionomer cement (GIC), or a resinous cement in combination with a dentinal bonding agent. After 10,000 thermal cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, artificial crowns were vertically loaded until compression to failure. Significant differences of fracture loads between experimental groups were assessed by paired Mann-Whitney U tests.
RESULTS: Minimal fracture resistance for all combinations excluded 500 N. However, 9 of 24 Artglass crowns cemented with ZnP loosened after thermocycling. Adhesive cementation resulted in a significantly greater fracture resistance compared with GIC and ZnP (P=.02). Increased occlusal thickness (0.5 to 1.3 mm) resulted in greater stability, whereas a 1-mm deep shoulder tooth preparation did not improve durability compared with a 0.5-mm chamfer finishing line.
CONCLUSION: A minimally invasive 0.5-mm axial chamfer tooth preparation combined with sufficient occlusal reduction and adhesive cementation recorded the greatest stability for posterior metal-free Artglass crowns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11005903     DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  5 in total

1.  CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System.

Authors:  G Sannino; F Germano; L Arcuri; E Bigelli; C Arcuri; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2015-04-13

2.  A comparison of the mechanical proprieties of different types of primary tooth restorations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Junhui Wang; Baize Zhang; Yujiang Chen; Lulu Wang; Yang Du; Xiaojing Wang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of chamfer and deep chamfer preparation designs on the fracture resistance of zirconia core restorations.

Authors:  Ezatollah Jalalian; Roghayeh Rostami; Berivan Atashkar
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-06-14

4.  The effect of preparation design on the fracture resistance of zirconia crown copings (computer associated design/computer associated machine, CAD/CAM system).

Authors:  E Jalalian; B Atashkar; R Rostami
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-09-30

5.  Fracture Resistance of New Metal-Free Materials Used for CAD-CAM Fabrication of Partial Posterior Restorations.

Authors:  Georgina García-Engra; Lucia Fernandez-Estevan; Javier Casas-Terrón; Antonio Fons-Font; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Juan Luis Román-Rodriguez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.