H D Poncia1, J Ryan, M Carver. 1. Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients over the age of 75 years comprise an increasing proportion of accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances. Within this group there is a high incidence of comorbidity, which mandates effective discharge coordination from the A&E department. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the needs of these patients the day after discharge, target patients for appropriate interventions and identify critical incidents. SETTING: The study was undertaken in a district general hospital A&E department that has 62000 new patient attendances per year. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients aged 75 years or over who were discharged from the A&E department. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Nursing home patients. Patients without a telephone. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-discharge information was collected from the medical notes. A community liaison nurse (CLN) then contacted patients by telephone. A semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patients. Patients were risk stratified and appropriate interventions made. Interventions initiated by the CLN were scored from 1 to 6 based on the level of input required. RESULTS: 551 patients or their carers were contacted by telephone. Existing home support was felt to be insufficient in 44 (8%) cases and in need of immediate intervention in a further 45 (8%) cases. Sixty five (11%) Category 1 patients required no intervention, 223 (42%) Category 2 patients required advice only, 107 (19%) Category 3 patients were referred to their GP, 127 (23%) Category 4 patients required a domicillary visit by a GP or a nurse, 26 (5%) Category 5 patients were at risk requiring urgent home assessment and three Category 6 patients had to re-attend A&E. Advice was given by the CLN on a broad range of issues and a wide range of health care services was accessed. Five hundred and fifty nine referrals were made by the CLN after telephone assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone follow up of patients over 75 attending our A&E department identified a number of areas where care could be improved before and after discharge. This low cost, high quality intervention has the potential for decreasing inappropriate return visits to the department by a vulnerable group of patients as well as improving overall quality of care.
BACKGROUND:Patients over the age of 75 years comprise an increasing proportion of accident and emergency (A&E) department attendances. Within this group there is a high incidence of comorbidity, which mandates effective discharge coordination from the A&E department. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the needs of these patients the day after discharge, target patients for appropriate interventions and identify critical incidents. SETTING: The study was undertaken in a district general hospital A&E department that has 62000 new patient attendances per year. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients aged 75 years or over who were discharged from the A&E department. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Nursing home patients. Patients without a telephone. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-discharge information was collected from the medical notes. A community liaison nurse (CLN) then contacted patients by telephone. A semistructured questionnaire was used to assess patients. Patients were risk stratified and appropriate interventions made. Interventions initiated by the CLN were scored from 1 to 6 based on the level of input required. RESULTS: 551 patients or their carers were contacted by telephone. Existing home support was felt to be insufficient in 44 (8%) cases and in need of immediate intervention in a further 45 (8%) cases. Sixty five (11%) Category 1 patients required no intervention, 223 (42%) Category 2 patients required advice only, 107 (19%) Category 3 patients were referred to their GP, 127 (23%) Category 4 patients required a domicillary visit by a GP or a nurse, 26 (5%) Category 5 patients were at risk requiring urgent home assessment and three Category 6 patients had to re-attend A&E. Advice was given by the CLN on a broad range of issues and a wide range of health care services was accessed. Five hundred and fifty nine referrals were made by the CLN after telephone assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone follow up of patients over 75 attending our A&E department identified a number of areas where care could be improved before and after discharge. This low cost, high quality intervention has the potential for decreasing inappropriate return visits to the department by a vulnerable group of patients as well as improving overall quality of care.
Authors: Pankaj B Patel; David R Vinson; Marla N Gardner; David A Wulf; Patricia Kipnis; Vincent Liu; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Lucy Ck Bell; Caitlin Norris-Grey; Akish Luintel; Gabriella Bidwell; David Lanham; Michael Marks; Tim Baruah; Luke O'Shea; Melissa Heightman; Sarah Logan Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Eduardo Bruera; Sriram Yennurajalingam; J Lynn Palmer; Pedro E Perez-Cruz; Susan Frisbee-Hume; Julio A Allo; Janet L Williams; Marlene Z Cohen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher Matthew Bond; Elizabeth A Freiheit; Lesley Podruzny; Alianu Akawakun Kingsly; Dongmei Wang; Jamie Davenport; Abram Gutscher; Cathy Askin; Allison Taylor; Vivian Lee; Queenie Choo; Eddy Samuel Lang Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2014-05-07
Authors: Merel van Loon-van Gaalen; Britt van Winsen; M Christien van der Linden; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Roos C van der Mast Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Bo Schouten; Babiche E J M Driesen; Hanneke Merten; Brigitte H C M Burger; Mariëlle G Hartjes; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Cordula Wagner Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.269
Authors: Merel van Loon-van Gaalen; M Christien van der Linden; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Roos C van der Mast Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 7.538