Literature DB >> 11005296

The role of the use of different host plants in the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii.

P Fernández Iriarte1, E Hasson.   

Abstract

Inversion polymorphisms often have been associated with fitness variation. Cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii has been used widely for the study of the maintenance of chromosomal variation. The purpose of this paper is to address the relative importance of variable selection regimes associated with the use of three different host cacti and antagonistic pleiotropy in the maintenance of chromosomal variation. Using homokaryotypic stocks derived from several lines homozygous for four second-chromosome arrangements, we show that inversions significantly affect first-instar larva to adult viability (VT), developmental time (DT) and adult thorax length (TL). We also show that the effects of inversions on DT and VT are dependent on the cactus rearing media. The effects of polymorphic gene arrangements on life-history traits suggest the existence of trade-offs between early and late fitness components. The dosage of arrangement 2st, the ancestral gene order, was negatively correlated with DT and TL, whereas flies carrying the derived arrangements 2j and 2jq7 had longer DTs and larger TLs. Arrangements 2st and 2jq7 increased viability, at least in one of the cactus media tested. Our results suggest that environmental heterogeneity, as represented by the use of different cactus hosts and the trade-off between DT and TL, may be involved in the maintenance of the polymorphism. In addition, our data suggest that the chromosomal phylogeny may be decoupled from the evolution of the genes affecting life-history traits linked to the inversion system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11005296     DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1295:trotuo]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Gonzalo Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mapping regions within cosmopolitan inversion In(3R)Payne associated with natural variation in body size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W Jason Kennington; Ary A Hoffmann; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Effects of reciprocal chromosomal translocations on the fitness of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Isabelle Colson; Daniela Delneri; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Adaptation to aridity in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae: chromosomal inversion polymorphism and body size influence resistance to desiccation.

Authors:  Caroline Fouet; Emilie Gray; Nora J Besansky; Carlo Costantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Geographic patterns of inversion polymorphism in the second chromosome of the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii from northeastern Argentina.

Authors:  Ignacio M Soto; Eduardo M Soto; Valeria P Carreira; Juan Hurtado; Juan J Fanara; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Effects of larval crowding on quantitative variation for development time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Barbara Horváth; Alex T Kalinka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Intercontinental karyotype-environment parallelism supports a role for a chromosomal inversion in local adaptation in a seaweed fly.

Authors:  Claire Mérot; Emma L Berdan; Charles Babin; Eric Normandeau; Maren Wellenreuther; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affect genital morphology in two Drosophila sibling species and their hybrids.

Authors:  Ignacio M Soto; Valeria P Carreira; Juan J Fanara; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Differences in tolerance to host cactus alkaloids in Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii.

Authors:  Ignacio M Soto; Valeria P Carreira; Cristian Corio; Julián Padró; Eduardo M Soto; Esteban Hasson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.