Literature DB >> 11005294

Morphological intergration between development compartments in the Drosophila wing.

C P Klingenberg1, S D Zaklan.   

Abstract

Developmental integration is the covariation among morphological structures due to connections between the developmental processes that built them. Here we use the methods of geometric morphometrics to study integration in the wing of Drosophila melanogaster. In particular, we focus on the hypothesis that the anterior and posterior wing compartments are separate developmental units that vary independently. We measured both variation among genetically diverse individuals and random differences between body sides of single individuals (fluctuating asymmetry, FA). For both of these sources of variation, the patterns of variation identified by principal component analyses all involved landmarks in both the anterior and posterior compartments simultaneously. Analyses focusing exclusively on the covariation between the anterior and posterior compartments, by the partial least-squares method, revealed pervasive integration of the two compartments, for both individual variation and FA. These analyses clearly indicate that the anterior and posterior compartments are not separate units of variation, but that the covariation between compartments is sufficient to account for nearly all the variation throughout the entire wing. We conclude that variation among individuals as well as the developmental perturbations responsible for FA generate shape variation primarily through developmental processes that are integrated across both compartments. In contrast, much less of the shape variation in our sample can be attributed to the localized processes that establish the identity of particular wing veins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11005294     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  49 in total

1.  Analysing phenotypic variation: when old-fashioned means up-to-date.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Jean R David
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods.

Authors:  Pedro Fernández Iriarte; Walkiria Céspedes; Mauro Santos
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg; Larry J Leamy; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The effects of weak genetic perturbations on the transcriptome of the wing imaginal disc and its association with wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Julie A Anderson; Youssef Idaghdour; Erin Kennerly Parker; Eric A Stone; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Bentho-pelagic divergence of cichlid feeding architecture was prodigious and consistent during multiple adaptive radiations within African rift-lakes.

Authors:  W James Cooper; Kevin Parsons; Alyssa McIntyre; Brittany Kern; Alana McGee-Moore; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  New insights into the phenotypic covariance structure of the anthropoid cranium.

Authors:  Jana Makedonska
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Fly wing vein patterns have spatial reproducibility of a single cell.

Authors:  Laurent Abouchar; Mariela D Petkova; Cynthia R Steinhardt; Thomas Gregor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.