Literature DB >> 11003826

Flexibility in basal metabolic rate and evaporative water loss among hoopoe larks exposed to different environmental temperatures.

J B Williams1, B I Tieleman.   

Abstract

The 'energy demand' hypothesis for short-term adjustments in basal metabolic rate (BMR) posits that birds adjust the size of their internal organs relative to food intake, a correlate of energy demand. We tested this hypothesis on hoopoe larks (Alaemon alaudipes), inhabitants of the Arabian desert, by acclimating birds for 3 weeks at 15 degrees C and at 36 degrees C, then measuring their BMR and total evaporative water loss (TEWL). Thereafter, we determined the dry masses of their brain, heart, liver, kidney, stomach, intestine and muscles of the pectoral region. Although mean body mass did not differ initially between the two groups, after 3 weeks, birds in the 15 degrees C group had gained mass (44.1+/-6.5 g), whereas larks in the 36 degrees C group had maintained a constant mass (36.6+/-3.6 g; means +/- s.d., N=6). Birds in the 15 degrees C group had a mean BMR of 46.8+/-6.9 kJ day(-1), whereas birds in the 36 degrees C group had a BMR of 32.9+/-6.3 kJ day(-1), values that were significantly different when we controlled for differences in body mass. When measured at 35 degrees C, larks in the cold-exposure group had a TEWL of 3.55+/-0.60 g H(2)O day(-)(1), whereas TEWL for birds in the 36 degrees C group averaged 2.23+/-0.28 g H(2)O day(-1), a difference of 59.2%. Mass-independent TEWL differed significantly between groups. Larks in the 15 degrees C group had a significantly larger liver, kidney and intestine than larks in the 36 degrees C group. The total increase in organ mass contributed 14.3% towards the total mass increment in the cold exposure group. Increased food intake among larks in the cold group apparently resulted in enlargement of some of the internal organs, and the increase in mass of these organs required a higher rate of oxygen uptake to support them. As oxygen demands increased, larks apparently lost more evaporative water, but the relationship between increases in BMR and TEWL remains unresolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003826     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.20.3153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  37 in total

1.  Adaptation of metabolism and evaporative water loss along an aridity gradient.

Authors:  B Irene Tieleman; Joseph B Williams; Paulette Bloomer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Is BMR repeatable in deer mice? Organ mass correlates and the effects of cold acclimation and natal altitude.

Authors:  G A Russell; M A Chappell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Basal metabolic rate of birds is associated with habitat temperature and precipitation, not primary productivity.

Authors:  Craig R White; Tim M Blackburn; Graham R Martin; Patrick J Butler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Phenotypic flexibility in basal metabolic rate and the changing view of avian physiological diversity: a review.

Authors:  Andrew E McKechnie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Physiological responses in rufous-collared sparrows to thermal acclimation and seasonal acclimatization.

Authors:  Karin Evelyn Maldonado; Grisel Cavieres; Claudio Veloso; Mauricio Canals; Pablo Sabat
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Effects of experiment start time and duration on measurement of standard physiological variables.

Authors:  Amanda J Page; Christine E Cooper; Philip C Withers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Effect of food restriction on the energy metabolism of the Chinese bulbul (Pycnonotus sinensis).

Authors:  Qing-Jian Liang; Lei Zhao; Jia-Qi Wang; Qian Chen; Wei-Hong Zheng; Jin-Song Liu
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 8.  Thermoregulation in endotherms: physiological principles and ecological consequences.

Authors:  Enrico L Rezende; Leonardo D Bacigalupe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 9.  How low can you go? An adaptive energetic framework for interpreting basal metabolic rate variation in endotherms.

Authors:  David L Swanson; Andrew E McKechnie; François Vézina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Ambient temperature does not affect fuelling rate in absence of digestive constraints in long-distance migrant shorebird fuelling up in captivity.

Authors:  Magali Petit; François Vézina; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.