Literature DB >> 11003414

Magnetic resonance urography: initial experience of a low-dose Gd-DTPA-enhanced technique.

K Szopiński1, M Szopińska, A Borówka, W Jakubowski.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography (MRU) is a promising tool in the evaluation of the renal collecting system, but it can be limited by T2* effects resulting from hyperconcentrated gadolinium chelates. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose dimeglumine gadopentetate (Gd-DTPA) MRU technique consisting of a dynamic fast low-angle-shot (FLASH) 2D sequence and a static fast imaging in steady state precession (FISP) 3D sequence for depicting the kidneys and urinary tract. The Gd-DTPA dose (0.01 mmol/kg) was established experimentally in a healthy volunteer study. Ninety-one patients presenting with various renal disorders were examined with a low-dose Gd-DTPA MRU and a T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) MRU technique on a 1.5-T system. Image quality and diagnostic value were considered at least satisfactory in 98.9% of the FLASH 2D studies, 83.5% of the FISP 3D studies and 78.5% of the TSE T2-weighted studies. Typical enhancement patterns were established for the renal cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma. The major limitations were motion artefacts and insufficient hydration of the patients. Low-dose Gd-DTPA MRU appears to be a useful technique in the evaluation of the kidneys and urinary tract, especially in cases of renal tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11003414     DOI: 10.1007/s003309900112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  6 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance urography for the assessment of potential renal donors: comparison of the RARE technique with a low-dose gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance urography technique in the absence of pharmacological and mechanical intervention.

Authors:  Klaus D Hagspiel; Sabah Butty; Kiran R Nandalur; Eric A Bissonette; Ming-Chen Paul Shih; Daniel A Leung; J Fritz Angle; David J Spinosa; Alan H Matsumoto; Hossam Ahmed; Hilary Sanfey; Ross B Isaacs; Robert G Sawyer; Timothy L Pruett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance urography: a practical approach to preparation, protocol and interpretation.

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Mohamed M Elsingergy; Susan J Back
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 3.  Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media.

Authors:  M F Bellin; M Vasile; S Morel-Precetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR urography for suspected upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Akira Kawashima; James F Glockner; Robert P Hartman; Bohyun Kim; Bernard F King
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessing renal function in children with hydronephrosis - additional feature of MR urography.

Authors:  George Hadjidekov; Savina Hadjidekova; Zahari Tonchev; Rumiana Bakalova; Ichio Aoki
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  MR urography (MRU) of non-dilated ureter with diuretic administration: Static fluid 2D FSE T2-weighted versus 3D gadolinium T1-weighted GE excretory MR.

Authors:  C Roy; M Ohana; Ph Host; G Alemann; A Labani; A Wattiez; H Lang
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2014-09-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.