M E McCaul1, G S Wand, C Rohde, S M Lee. 1. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. betsymc@jhmi.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence for the role of the endogenous opioid system in alcohol reinforcement and consumption; however, recent human laboratory studies and clinical trials have reported mixed effects of naltrexone (a nonselective opioid antagonist) on alcohol-related behaviors. This paper reports a secondary data analysis of a human laboratory study that examines the relationship between serum levels of 6-beta-naltrexol, the major, biologically active metabolite of naltrexone, and subjective effects of alcohol. METHODS: The study used a within-subjects design to examine the effects of naltrexone (0, 50, and 100 mg/day) on subjective responses to alcohol (none, moderate, and high dose) in heavy drinkers (n = 23). Each subject received three doses of naltrexone in random order; each naltrexone dose was administered over an 8 day period on an inpatient unit, with a 1 week outpatient washout between doses. After stabilization at each of the naltrexone doses, subjects participated in three alcohol challenge sessions (none, moderate, and high dose) in random order; thus, each subject participated in a total of nine alcohol administration sessions. RESULTS: Doubling the naltrexone dose (50 vs. 100 mg/day) doubled the mean serum 6-beta-naltrexol levels. At each naltrexone dose, there was a 4-fold range in 6-beta-naltrexol levels across subjects. Before alcohol administration, higher 6-beta-naltrexol levels were associated with higher ratings of sedation. After high-dose alcohol administration, higher 6-beta-naltrexol levels were associated with significantly lower ratings of liking and best effects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence of the involvement of the opioid system in the modulation of alcohol effects and suggest that serum 6-beta-naltrexol concentrations may be important in predicting therapeutic response to naltrexone.
BACKGROUND: There is strong evidence for the role of the endogenous opioid system in alcohol reinforcement and consumption; however, recent human laboratory studies and clinical trials have reported mixed effects of naltrexone (a nonselective opioid antagonist) on alcohol-related behaviors. This paper reports a secondary data analysis of a human laboratory study that examines the relationship between serum levels of 6-beta-naltrexol, the major, biologically active metabolite of naltrexone, and subjective effects of alcohol. METHODS: The study used a within-subjects design to examine the effects of naltrexone (0, 50, and 100 mg/day) on subjective responses to alcohol (none, moderate, and high dose) in heavy drinkers (n = 23). Each subject received three doses of naltrexone in random order; each naltrexone dose was administered over an 8 day period on an inpatient unit, with a 1 week outpatient washout between doses. After stabilization at each of the naltrexone doses, subjects participated in three alcohol challenge sessions (none, moderate, and high dose) in random order; thus, each subject participated in a total of nine alcohol administration sessions. RESULTS: Doubling the naltrexone dose (50 vs. 100 mg/day) doubled the mean serum 6-beta-naltrexol levels. At each naltrexone dose, there was a 4-fold range in 6-beta-naltrexol levels across subjects. Before alcohol administration, higher 6-beta-naltrexol levels were associated with higher ratings of sedation. After high-dose alcohol administration, higher 6-beta-naltrexol levels were associated with significantly lower ratings of liking and best effects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence of the involvement of the opioid system in the modulation of alcohol effects and suggest that serum 6-beta-naltrexol concentrations may be important in predicting therapeutic response to naltrexone.
Authors: Stephanie S O'Malley; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Sherry A McKee; Robert F Leeman; Ned L Cooney; Boris Meandzija; Ran Wu; Robert W Makuch Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Andrea C King; Deborah Hasin; Sean J O'Connor; Patrick J McNamara; Dingcai Cao Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Elise M Weerts; Gary S Wand; Hiroto Kuwabara; Xiaoqiang Xu; J James Frost; Dean F Wong; Mary E McCaul Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: David W Oslin; Kevin G Lynch; Helen M Pettinati; Kyle M Kampman; Peter Gariti; Lois Gelfand; Thomas Ten Have; Shoshana Wortman; William Dundon; Charles Dackis; Joseph R Volpicelli; Charles P O'Brien Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Paul K Kiptoo; Kalpana S Paudel; Dana C Hammell; Mohamed O Hamad; Peter A Crooks; Audra L Stinchcomb Journal: Eur J Pharm Sci Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Stan L Banks; Raghotham R Pinninti; Harvinder S Gill; Kalpana S Paudel; Peter A Crooks; Nicole K Brogden; Mark R Prausnitz; Audra L Stinchcomb Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Chiara Giuliano; Trevor W Robbins; David R Wille; Edward T Bullmore; Barry J Everitt Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 4.530