OBJECTIVE: To compare oral misoprostol 400 microg with intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU in the routine management of the third stage. DESIGN: Double-blind placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Main referral hospital and its associated polyclinics in Accra, Ghana. POPULATION: Four hundred and one low risk women, in the second stage of labour with anticipated vaginal delivery, who entered labour spontaneously. METHODS: After delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby, the women were randomised to receive either: 1. misoprostol 400 microg powder in water orally and 1 mL normal saline intramuscular injection (placebo); or 2. powdered cellulose in waterorally (placebo) and 1 mL oxytocin 10 IU intramuscular injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in haemoglobin concentration from before delivery to 12 hours postpartum. Secondary outcomes included need for additional oxytocics, blood loss > 500 mL and > 1,000 mL, operative intervention for postpartum haemorrhage, and side effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, shivering and elevated temperature. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar. There was no significant difference in change in haemoglobin concentration between the two groups (0.60 g/dL for misoprostol and 0.55 g/dL for oxytocin; relative difference 9.6%; 95% CI 20.5-39.6%; P = 0.54). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes with the exception of shivering, which occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (22.2% vs 5.7%; relative risk 4.73; 95% CI 2.31-9.68; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In low risk women oral misoprostol appears to be as effective in minimising blood loss in the third stage of labour as intramuscular oxytocin. Shivering was noted more frequently with misoprostol use, but no other side effects were noted. Misoprostol has great potential for use in the third stage of labour especially in developing countries.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare oral misoprostol 400 microg with intramuscular oxytocin 10 IU in the routine management of the third stage. DESIGN: Double-blind placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Main referral hospital and its associated polyclinics in Accra, Ghana. POPULATION: Four hundred and one low risk women, in the second stage of labour with anticipated vaginal delivery, who entered labour spontaneously. METHODS: After delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby, the women were randomised to receive either: 1. misoprostol 400 microg powder in water orally and 1 mL normal saline intramuscular injection (placebo); or 2. powdered cellulose in water orally (placebo) and 1 mL oxytocin 10 IU intramuscular injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in haemoglobin concentration from before delivery to 12 hours postpartum. Secondary outcomes included need for additional oxytocics, blood loss > 500 mL and > 1,000 mL, operative intervention for postpartum haemorrhage, and side effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, shivering and elevated temperature. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar. There was no significant difference in change in haemoglobin concentration between the two groups (0.60 g/dL for misoprostol and 0.55 g/dL for oxytocin; relative difference 9.6%; 95% CI 20.5-39.6%; P = 0.54). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes with the exception of shivering, which occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (22.2% vs 5.7%; relative risk 4.73; 95% CI 2.31-9.68; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In low risk women oral misoprostol appears to be as effective in minimising blood loss in the third stage of labour as intramuscular oxytocin. Shivering was noted more frequently with misoprostol use, but no other side effects were noted. Misoprostol has great potential for use in the third stage of labour especially in developing countries.
Authors: G Justus Hofmeyr; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Natalia Novikova; Verena Linder; Sandra Ferreira; Gilda Piaggio Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Heleen J van Beekhuizen; Andrea B Pembe; Heiner Fauteck; Fred K Lotgering Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Ioannis D Gallos; Helen M Williams; Malcolm J Price; Abi Merriel; Harold Gee; David Lissauer; Vidhya Moorthy; Aurelio Tobias; Jonathan J Deeks; Mariana Widmer; Özge Tunçalp; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; G Justus Hofmeyr; Arri Coomarasamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-04-25