Literature DB >> 11001413

Mechanical comparison of a distal femoral side plate and a retrograde intramedullary nail.

R W Meyer1, N A Plaxton, P D Postak, A Gilmore, M I Froimson, A S Greenwald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare quantitatively the axial and torsional stiffness of a retrograde intramedullary nail and a fixed angle screw side plate in treating a supracondylar femur fracture in osteopenic femora. To determine the modes of failure of an intramedullary nail and a side plate under axial loading.
DESIGN: Matched pair cadaveric study.
SETTING: Orthopaedic biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eleven matched pairs of preserved human femora were selected. The cadaveric specimens were harvested from relatively elderly donors with an average age of 75.6 years, which represents the principal population at risk for poor fracture fixation. INTERVENTION: The eleven matched pairs were osteotomized to simulate segmental structural defects in the supracondylar region. One femur of each matched pair was fixed with an intramedullary nail, and the contralateral femur was fixed with a side plate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial and torsional stiffness values. Axial modes of failure.
RESULTS: The intramedullary nail axial stiffness was 14 percent (p = 0.04) less and torsional stiffness was 17 percent (p = 0.05) less than that provided by the side plate. The axial failure of the intramedullary nail occurred distally, allowing the hardware to protrude into the articular space. The side plate also failed distally by displacing the condylar screw into a varus angulation.
CONCLUSION: The mechanical advantages favor the use of the side plate if fixation stiffness is essential. The axial mode of failure occurs distally for both fixation devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11001413     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200008000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  Double plating of intra-articular multifragmentary C3-type distal femoral fractures through the anterior approach.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Ahmed Torieh; Ahmed Matthana
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-07-14

2.  Far cortical locking enables flexible fixation with periarticular locking plates.

Authors:  Josef Doornink; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Nailing versus plating for comminuted fractures of the distal femur: a comparative biomechanical in vitro study of three implants.

Authors:  I Mehling; P Hoehle; W Sternstein; J Blum; P M Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  A distal femoral supra-condylar plate: biomechanical comparison with condylar plate and first clinical application for treatment of supracondylar fracture.

Authors:  Bowei Liang; Zhenqi Ding; Junguo Shen; Wenliang Zhai; Liangqi Kang; Liang Zhou; Mo Sha; Dongzhu Liang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Nail diameter significantly impacts stability in combined plate-nail constructs used for fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures.

Authors:  David J Wright; Donald J DeSanto; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee; John A Scolaro
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-02-15

6.  Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the dynamic compression screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures.

Authors:  Laurence M O'Connor-Read; Jerome A Davidson; Benjamin M Davies; Michael G Matthews; Paul Smirthwaite
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.