Literature DB >> 11001171

Impact of closed versus open venous reservoirs on patient outcomes in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

C Brown Mahoney1, J E Donnelly.   

Abstract

Data were collected retrospectively on 1,681 consecutive isolated coronary artery bypass graft patients at Millard Fillmore Hospital (Buffalo, New York, USA) undergoing coronary artery bypass. No patients were excluded. There were 616 patients in the open circuit group and 1,065 in the closed circuit group. Patients in the closed circuit group exhibited a trend towards a higher incidence of most pre-existing comorbidities, with acute myocardial infarction, pre-existing cerebrovascular disease and the incidence of extensively calcified aortas all being significantly higher. Significantly different postbypass outcomes favored the closed circuit group, with levels of sepsis of 1% for open and 0% for closed and respiratory failure of 4% for open and 1% for closed. The length of stay approached significance with a p-value of 0.057 (open 9.85 days and closed 7.53). Use of an open circuit was a significant, independent predictor for increased use of units of packed red blood cells and total units of blood products. This study provides evidence that closed venous reservoirs can favorably impact surgical outcomes and reduce resulting healthcare costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11001171     DOI: 10.1177/026765910001500510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  2 in total

1.  Microbubble generation and transmission of medtronic's affinity hardshell venous reservoir and collapsible venous reservoir bag: an in-vitro comparison.

Authors:  Kieron C Potger; Darryl McMillan; Mark Ambrose
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-09

2.  Technical Approach Determines Inflammatory Response after Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Gabor Erdoes; Christoph Lippuner; Istvan Kocsis; Marcel Schiff; Monika Stucki; Thierry Carrel; Stephan Windecker; Balthasar Eberle; Frank Stueber; Malte Book
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.